<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0081" id="link2HCH0081"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XXV——NOT TO COUNTERFEIT BEING SICK </h2>
<p>There is an epigram in Martial, and one of the very good ones—for he
has of all sorts—where he pleasantly tells the story of Caelius,
who, to avoid making his court to some great men of Rome, to wait their
rising, and to attend them abroad, pretended to have the gout; and the
better to colour this anointed his legs, and had them lapped up in a great
many swathings, and perfectly counterfeited both the gesture and
countenance of a gouty person; till in the end, Fortune did him the
kindness to make him one indeed:</p>
<p>"Quantum curs potest et ars doloris<br/>
Desiit fingere Caelius podagram."<br/>
<br/>
["How great is the power of counterfeiting pain: Caelius has ceased<br/>
to feign the gout; he has got it."—Martial, Ep., vii. 39, 8.]<br/></p>
<p>I think I have read somewhere in Appian a story like this, of one who to
escape the proscriptions of the triumvirs of Rome, and the better to be
concealed from the discovery of those who pursued him, having hidden
himself in a disguise, would yet add this invention, to counterfeit having
but one eye; but when he came to have a little more liberty, and went to
take off the plaster he had a great while worn over his eye, he found he
had totally lost the sight of it indeed, and that it was absolutely gone.
'Tis possible that the action of sight was dulled from having been so long
without exercise, and that the optic power was wholly retired into the
other eye: for we evidently perceive that the eye we keep shut sends some
part of its virtue to its fellow, so that it will swell and grow bigger;
and so inaction, with the heat of ligatures and, plasters, might very well
have brought some gouty humour upon the counterfeiter in Martial.</p>
<p>Reading in Froissart the vow of a troop of young English gentlemen, to
keep their left eyes bound up till they had arrived in France and
performed some notable exploit upon us, I have often been tickled with
this thought, that it might have befallen them as it did those others, and
they might have returned with but an eye a-piece to their mistresses, for
whose sakes they had made this ridiculous vow.</p>
<p>Mothers have reason to rebuke their children when they counterfeit having
but one eye, squinting, lameness, or any other personal defect; for,
besides that their bodies being then so tender, may be subject to take an
ill bent, fortune, I know not how, sometimes seems to delight in taking us
at our word; and I have heard several examples related of people who have
become really sick, by only feigning to be so. I have always used, whether
on horseback or on foot, to carry a stick in my hand, and even to affect
doing it with an elegant air; many have threatened that this fancy would
one day be turned into necessity: if so, I should be the first of my
family to have the gout.</p>
<p>But let us a little lengthen this chapter, and add another anecdote
concerning blindness. Pliny reports of one who, dreaming he was blind,
found himself so indeed in the morning without any preceding infirmity in
his eyes. The force of imagination might assist in this case, as I have
said elsewhere, and Pliny seems to be of the same opinion; but it is more
likely that the motions which the body felt within, of which physicians,
if they please, may find out the cause, taking away his sight, were the
occasion of his dream.</p>
<p>Let us add another story, not very improper for this subject, which Seneca
relates in one of his epistles: "You know," says he, writing to Lucilius,
"that Harpaste, my wife's fool, is thrown upon me as an hereditary charge,
for I have naturally an aversion to those monsters; and if I have a mind
to laugh at a fool, I need not seek him far; I can laugh at myself. This
fool has suddenly lost her sight: I tell you a strange, but a very true
thing she is not sensible that she is blind, but eternally importunes her
keeper to take her abroad, because she says the house is dark. That what
we laugh at in her, I pray you to believe, happens to every one of us: no
one knows himself to be avaricious or grasping; and, again, the blind call
for a guide, while we stray of our own accord. I am not ambitious, we say;
but a man cannot live otherwise at Rome; I am not wasteful, but the city
requires a great outlay; 'tis not my fault if I am choleric—if I
have not yet established any certain course of life: 'tis the fault of
youth. Let us not seek our disease out of ourselves; 'tis in us, and
planted in our bowels; and the mere fact that we do not perceive ourselves
to be sick, renders us more hard to be cured. If we do not betimes begin
to see to ourselves, when shall we have provided for so many wounds and
evils wherewith we abound? And yet we have a most sweet and charming
medicine in philosophy; for of all the rest we are sensible of no pleasure
till after the cure: this pleases and heals at once." This is what Seneca
says, that has carried me from my subject, but there is advantage in the
change.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />