<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0064" id="link2HCH0064"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER VII——OF RECOMPENSES OF HONOUR </h2>
<p>They who write the life of Augustus Caesar,—[Suetonius, Life of
Augustus, c. 25.]—observe this in his military discipline, that he
was wonderfully liberal of gifts to men of merit, but that as to the true
recompenses of honour he was as sparing; yet he himself had been gratified
by his uncle with all the military recompenses before he had ever been in
the field. It was a pretty invention, and received into most governments
of the world, to institute certain vain and in themselves valueless
distinctions to honour and recompense virtue, such as the crowns of
laurel, oak, and myrtle, the particular fashion of some garment, the
privilege to ride in a coach in the city, or at night with a torch, some
peculiar place assigned in public assemblies, the prerogative of certain
additional names and titles, certain distinctions in the bearing of coats
of arms, and the like, the use of which, according to the several humours
of nations, has been variously received, and yet continues.</p>
<p>We in France, as also several of our neighbours, have orders of knighthood
that are instituted only for this end. And 'tis, in earnest, a very good
and profitable custom to find out an acknowledgment for the worth of rare
and excellent men, and to satisfy them with rewards that are not at all
chargeable either to prince or people. And that which has always been
found by ancient experience, and which we have heretofore observed among
ourselves, that men of quality have ever been more jealous of such
recompenses than of those wherein there was gain and profit, is not
without very good ground and reason. If with the reward, which ought to be
simply a recompense of honour, they should mix other commodities and add
riches, this mixture, instead of procuring an increase of estimation,
would debase and abate it. The Order of St. Michael, which has been so
long in repute amongst us, had no greater commodity than that it had no
communication with any other commodity, which produced this effect, that
formerly there was no office or title whatever to which the gentry
pretended with so great desire and affection as they did to that; no
quality that carried with it more respect and grandeur, valour and worth
more willingly embracing and with greater ambition aspiring to a
recompense purely its own, and rather glorious than profitable. For, in
truth, other gifts have not so great a dignity of usage, by reason they
are laid out upon all sorts of occasions; with money a man pays the wages
of a servant, the diligence of a courier, dancing, vaulting, speaking, and
the meanest offices we receive; nay, and reward vice with it too, as
flattery, treachery, and pimping; and therefore 'tis no wonder if virtue
less desires and less willingly receives this common sort of payment, than
that which is proper and peculiar to her, throughout generous and noble.
Augustus had reason to be more sparing of this than the other, insomuch
that honour is a privilege which derives its principal essence from
rarity; and so virtue itself:</p>
<p>"Cui malus est nemo, quis bonus esse potest?"<br/>
<br/>
["To whom no one is ill who can be good?"-Martial, xii. 82.]<br/></p>
<p>We do not intend it for a commendation when we say that such a one is
careful in the education of his children, by reason it is a common act,
how just and well done soever; no more than we commend a great tree, where
the whole forest is the same. I do not think that any citizen of Sparta
glorified himself much upon his valour, it being the universal virtue of
the whole nation; and as little upon his fidelity and contempt of riches.
There is no recompense becomes virtue, how great soever, that is once
passed into a custom; and I know not withal whether we can ever call it
great, being common.</p>
<p>Seeing, then, that these remunerations of honour have no other value and
estimation but only this, that few people enjoy them, 'tis but to be
liberal of them to bring them down to nothing. And though there should be
now more men found than in former times worthy of our order, the
estimation of it nevertheless should not be abated, nor the honour made
cheap; and it may easily happen that more may merit it; for there is no
virtue that so easily spreads as that of military valour. There is another
virtue, true, perfect, and philosophical, of which I do not speak, and
only make use of the word in our common acceptation, much greater than
this and more full, which is a force and assurance of the soul, equally
despising all sorts of adverse accidents, equable, uniform, and constant,
of which ours is no more than one little ray. Use, education, example, and
custom can do all in all to the establishment of that whereof I am
speaking, and with great facility render it common, as by the experience
of our civil wars is manifest enough; and whoever could at this time unite
us all, Catholic and Huguenot, into one body, and set us upon some brave
common enterprise, we should again make our ancient military reputation
flourish. It is most certain that in times past the recompense of this
order had not only a regard to valour, but had a further prospect; it
never was the reward of a valiant soldier but of a great captain; the
science of obeying was not reputed worthy of so honourable a guerdon.
There was therein a more universal military expertness required, and that
comprehended the most and the greatest qualities of a military man:</p>
<p>"Neque enim eaedem militares et imperatorix artes sunt,"<br/>
<br/>
["For the arts of soldiery and generalship are not the same."<br/>
—Livy, xxv. 19.]<br/></p>
<p>as also, besides, a condition suitable to such a dignity. But, I say,
though more men were worthy than formerly, yet ought it not to be more
liberally distributed, and it were better to fall short in not giving it
at all to whom it should be due, than for ever to lose, as we have lately
done, the fruit of so profitable an invention. No man of spirit will deign
to advantage himself with what is in common with many; and such of the
present time as have least merited this recompense themselves make the
greater show of disdaining it, in order thereby to be ranked with those to
whom so much wrong has been done by the unworthy conferring and debasing
the distinction which was their particular right.</p>
<p>Now, to expect that in obliterating and abolishing this, suddenly to
create and bring into credit a like institution, is not a proper attempt
for so licentious and so sick a time as this wherein we now are; and it
will fall out that the last will from its birth incur the same
inconveniences that have ruined the other.—[Montaigne refers to the
Order of the Saint-Esprit, instituted by Henry III. in 1578.]—The
rules for dispensing this new order had need to be extremely clipt and
bound under great restrictions, to give it authority; and this tumultuous
season is incapable of such a curb: besides that, before this can be
brought into repute, 'tis necessary that the memory of the first, and of
the contempt into which it is fallen, be buried in oblivion.</p>
<p>This place might naturally enough admit of some discourse upon the
consideration of valour, and the difference of this virtue from others;
but, Plutarch having so often handled this subject, I should give myself
an unnecessary trouble to repeat what he has said. But this is worth
considering: that our nation places valour, vaillance, in the highest
degree of virtue, as its very word evidences, being derived from valeur,
and that, according to our use, when we say a man of high worth a good
man, in our court style—'tis to say a valiant man, after the Roman
way; for the general appellation of virtue with them takes etymology from
vis, force. The proper, sole, and essential profession of, the French
noblesse is that of arms: and 'tis likely that the first virtue that
discovered itself amongst men and has given to some advantage over others,
was that by which the strongest and most valiant have mastered the weaker,
and acquired a particular authority and reputation, whence came to it that
dignified appellation; or else, that these nations, being very warlike,
gave the pre-eminence to that of the virtues which was most familiar to
them; just as our passion and the feverish solicitude we have of the
chastity of women occasions that to say, a good woman, a woman of worth, a
woman of honour and virtue, signifies merely a chaste woman as if, to
oblige them to that one duty, we were indifferent as to all the rest, and
gave them the reins in all other faults whatever to compound for that one
of incontinence.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />