<p><SPAN name="c14" id="c14"></SPAN> </p>
<p> </p>
<h3>CHAPTER II.</h3>
<h4>'EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS.'<br/> </h4>
<p><span class="smallcaps">But</span>
there arose a trouble greater than that occasioned by the
'Broughton Gazette.' There came out an article in a London weekly
newspaper, called 'Everybody's Business,' which nearly drove the
Doctor mad. This was on the last Saturday of the holidays. The
holidays had been commenced in the middle of July, and went on
till the end of August. Things had not gone well at Bowick during
these weeks. The parents of all the four newly-expected boys
had—changed their minds. One father had discovered that he could
not afford it. Another declared that the mother could not be got
to part with her darling quite so soon as he had expected. A
third had found that a private tutor at home would best suit his
purposes. While the fourth boldly said that he did not like to
send his boy because of the "fuss" which had been made about Mr.
and Mrs. Peacocke. Had this last come alone, the Doctor would
probably have resented such a communication; but following the
others as it did, he preferred the fourth man to any of the other
three. "Miserable cowards," he said to himself, as he docketed
the letters and put them away. But the greatest blow of all,—of
all blows of this sort,—came to him from poor Lady Anne Clifford.
She wrote a piteous letter to him, in which she implored him to
allow her to take her two boys away.</p>
<p>"My dear Doctor Wortle," she said, "so many people have been
telling so many dreadful things about this horrible affair, that I
do not dare to send my darling boys back to Bowick again. Uncle
Clifford and Lord Robert both say that I should be very wrong.
The Marchioness has said so much about it that I dare not go
against her. You know what my own feelings are about you and dear
Mrs. Wortle; but I am not my own mistress. They all tell me that
it is my first duty to think about the dear boys' welfare; and of
course that is true. I hope you won't be very angry with me, and
will write one line to say that you forgive me.—Yours most
sincerely,</p>
<p class="ind15">"<span class="smallcaps">Anne
Clifford</span>."<br/> </p>
<p>In answer to this the Doctor did write as
<span class="nowrap">follows;—</span><br/> </p>
<p>"<span class="smallcaps">My dear Lady Anne</span>,—Of
course your duty is very plain,—to do
what you think best for the boys; and it is natural enough that
you should follow the advice of your relatives and
theirs.—Faithfully yours,</p>
<p class="ind15">"<span class="smallcaps">Jeffrey
Wortle</span>."<br/> </p>
<p>He could not bring himself to write in a more friendly tone, or to
tell her that he forgave her. His sympathies were not with her.
His sympathies at the present moment were only with Mrs. Peacocke.
But then Lady Anne Clifford was not a beautiful woman, as was Mrs.
Peacocke.</p>
<p>This was a great blow. Two other boys had also been summoned
away, making five in all, whose premature departure was owing
altogether to the virulent tongue of that wretched old Mother
Shipton. And there had been four who were to come in the place of
four others, who, in the course of nature, were going to carry on
their more advanced studies elsewhere. Vacancies such as these had
always been pre-occupied long beforehand by ambitious parents.
These very four places had been pre-occupied, but now they were
all vacant. There would be nine empty beds in the school when it
met again after the holidays; and the Doctor well understood that
nine beds remaining empty would soon cause others to be emptied.
It is success that creates success, and decay that produces decay.
Gradual decay he knew that he could not endure. He must shut up
his school,—give up his employment,—and retire altogether from
the activity of life. He felt that if it came to this with him he
must in very truth turn his face to the wall and die. Would
it,—would it really come to that, that Mrs. Stantiloup should
have altogether conquered him in the combat that had sprung up
between them?</p>
<p>But yet he would not give up Mrs. Peacocke. Indeed, circumstanced
as he was, he could not give her up. He had promised not only
her, but her absent husband, that until his return there should be
a home for her in the school-house. There would be a cowardice in
going back from his word which was altogether foreign to his
nature. He could not bring himself to retire from the fight, even
though by doing so he might save himself from the actual final
slaughter which seemed to be imminent. He thought only of making
fresh attacks upon his enemy, instead of meditating flight from
those which were made upon him. As a dog, when another dog has
got him well by the ear, thinks not at all of his own wound, but
only how he may catch his enemy by the lip, so was the Doctor in
regard to Mrs. Stantiloup. When the two Clifford boys were taken
away, he took some joy to himself in remembering that Mr.
Stantiloup could not pay his butcher's bill.</p>
<p>Then, just at the end of the holidays, some good-natured friend
sent to him a copy of 'Everybody's Business.' There is no duty
which a man owes to himself more clearly than that of throwing
into the waste-paper basket, unsearched and even unopened, all
newspapers sent to him without a previously-declared purpose. The
sender has either written something himself which he wishes to
force you to read, or else he has been desirous of wounding you by
some ill-natured criticism upon yourself. 'Everybody's Business'
was a paper which, in the natural course of things, did not find
its way into the Bowick Rectory; and the Doctor, though he was no
doubt acquainted with the title, had never even looked at its
columns. It was the purpose of the periodical to amuse its
readers, as its name declared, with the private affairs of their
neighbours. It went boldly about its work, excusing itself by the
assertion that Jones was just as well inclined to be talked about
as Smith was to hear whatever could be said about Jones. As both
parties were served, what could be the objection? It was in the
main good-natured, and probably did most frequently gratify the
Joneses, while it afforded considerable amusement to the listless
and numerous Smiths of the world. If you can't read and
understand Jones's speech in Parliament, you may at any rate have
mind enough to interest yourself with the fact that he never
composed a word of it in his own room without a ring on his finger
and a flower in his button-hole. It may also be agreeable to know
that Walker the poet always takes a mutton-chop and two glasses of
sherry at half-past one. 'Everybody's Business' did this for
everybody to whom such excitement was agreeable. But in managing
everybody's business in that fashion, let a writer be as
good-natured as he may and let the principle be ever so
well-founded that nobody is to be hurt, still there are dangers.
It is not always easy to know what will hurt and what will not.
And then sometimes there will come a temptation to be, not
spiteful, but specially amusing. There must be danger, and a
writer will sometimes be indiscreet. Personalities will lead to
libels even when the libeller has been most innocent. It may be
that after all the poor poet never drank a glass of sherry before
dinner in his life,—it may be that a little toast-and-water, even
with his dinner, gives him all the refreshment that he wants, and
that two glasses of alcoholic mixture in the middle of the day
shall seem, when imputed to him, to convey a charge of downright
inebriety. But the writer has perhaps learned to regard two
glasses of meridian wine as but a moderate amount of sustentation.
This man is much flattered if it be given to be understood of him
that he falls in love with every pretty woman that he
sees;—whereas another will think that he has been made subject to
a foul calumny by such insinuation.</p>
<p>'Everybody's Business' fell into some such mistake as this, in
that very amusing article which was written for the delectation of
its readers in reference to Dr. Wortle and Mrs. Peacocke. The
'Broughton Gazette' no doubt confined itself to the clerical and
highly moral views of the case, and, having dealt with the subject
chiefly on behalf of the Close and the admirers of the Close, had
made no allusion to the fact that Mrs. Peacocke was a very pretty
woman. One or two other local papers had been more scurrilous,
and had, with ambiguous and timid words, alluded to the Doctor's
personal admiration for the lady. These, or the rumours created
by them, had reached one of the funniest and lightest-handed of
the contributors to 'Everybody's Business,' and he had concocted
an amusing article,—which he had not intended to be at all
libellous, which he had thought to be only funny. He had not
appreciated, probably, the tragedy of the lady's position, or the
sanctity of that of the gentleman. There was comedy in the idea
of the Doctor having sent one husband away to America to look
after the other while he consoled the wife in England. "It must be
admitted," said the writer, "that the Doctor has the best of it.
While one gentleman is gouging the other,—as cannot but be
expected,—the Doctor will be at any rate in security, enjoying
the smiles of beauty under his own fig-tree at Bowick. After a
hot morning with 'τυπτω' in the school,
there will be 'amo' in
the cool of the evening." And this was absolutely sent to him by
some good-natured friend!</p>
<p>The funny writer obtained a popularity wider probably than he had
expected. His words reached Mrs. Stantiloup, as well as the
Doctor, and were read even in the Bishop's palace. They were
quoted even in the 'Broughton Gazette,' not with approbation, but
in a high tone of moral severity. "See the nature of the language
to which Dr. Wortle's conduct has subjected the whole of the
diocese!" That was the tone of the criticism made by the
'Broughton Gazette' on the article in 'Everybody's Business.'
"What else has he a right to expect?" said Mrs. Stantiloup to Mrs.
Rolland, having made quite a journey into Broughton for the sake
of discussing it at the palace. There she explained it all to
Mrs. Rolland, having herself studied the passage so as fully to
appreciate the virus contained in it. "He passes all the morning
in the school whipping the boys himself because he has sent Mr.
Peacocke away, and then amuses himself in the evening by making
love to Mr. Peacocke's wife, as he calls her." Dr. Wortle, when he
read and re-read the article, and when the jokes which were made
upon it reached his ears, as they were sure to do, was nearly
maddened by what he called the heartless iniquity of the world;
but his state became still worse when he received an affectionate
but solemn letter from the Bishop warning him of his danger. An
affectionate letter from a bishop must surely be the most
disagreeable missive which a parish clergyman can receive.
Affection from one man to another is not natural in letters. A
bishop never writes affectionately unless he means to reprove
severely. When he calls a clergyman his "dear brother in Christ,"
he is sure to go on to show that the man so called is altogether
unworthy of the name. So it was with a letter now received at
Bowick, in which the Bishop expressed his opinion that Dr. Wortle
ought not to pay any further visits to Mrs. Peacocke till she
should have settled herself down with one legitimate husband, let
that legitimate husband be who it might. The Bishop did not
indeed, at first, make reference by name to 'Everybody's
Business,' but he stated that the "metropolitan press" had taken
up the matter, and that scandal would take place in the diocese if
further cause were given. "It is not enough to be innocent," said
the Bishop, "but men must know
<ins class="corr" title="Ending double quotation
mark added">that we are so."</ins></p>
<p>Then there came a sharp and pressing correspondence between the
Bishop and the Doctor, which lasted four or five days. The
Doctor, without referring to any other portion of the Bishop's
letter, demanded to know to what "metropolitan newspaper" the
Bishop had alluded, as, if any such paper had spread scandalous
imputations as to him, the Doctor, respecting the lady in
question, it would be his, the Doctor's, duty to proceed against
that newspaper for libel. In answer to this the Bishop, in a note
much shorter and much less affectionate than his former letter,
said that he did not wish to name any metropolitan newspaper. But
the Doctor would not, of course, put up with such an answer as
this. He wrote very solemnly now, if not affectionately. "His
lordship had spoken of 'scandal in the diocese.' The words," said
the Doctor, "contained a most grave charge. He did not mean to
say that any such accusation had been made by the Bishop himself;
but such accusation must have been made by some one at least of
the London newspapers or the Bishop would not have been justified
in what he has written. Under such circumstances he, Dr. Wortle,
thought himself entitled to demand from the Bishop the name of the
newspaper in question, and the date on which the article had
appeared."</p>
<p>In answer to this there came no written reply, but a copy of the
'Everybody's Business' which the Doctor had already seen. He had,
no doubt, known from the first that it was the funny paragraph
about 'τυπτω'
and "amo" to which the Bishop had referred. But
in the serious steps which he now intended to take, he was
determined to have positive proof from the hands of the Bishop
himself. The Bishop had not directed the pernicious newspaper
with his own hands, but if called upon, could not deny that it had
been sent from the palace by his orders. Having received it, the
Doctor wrote back at once as
<span class="nowrap">follows;—</span><br/> </p>
<p>"<span class="smallcaps">Right Reverend and dear
Lord</span>,—Any word coming from your lordship
to me is of grave importance, as should, I think, be all words
coming from a bishop to his clergy; and they are of special
importance when containing a reproof, whether deserved or
undeserved. The scurrilous and vulgar attack made upon me in the
newspaper which your lordship has sent to me would not have been
worthy of my serious notice had it not been made worthy by your
lordship as being the ground on which such a letter was written to
me as that of your lordship's of the 12th instant. Now it has
been invested with so much solemnity by your lordship's notice of
it that I feel myself obliged to defend myself against it by
public action.</p>
<p>"If I have given just cause of scandal to the diocese I will
retire both from my living and from my school. But before doing
so I will endeavour to prove that I have done neither. This I can
only do by publishing in a court of law all the circumstances in
reference to my connection with Mr. and Mrs. Peacocke. As regards
myself, this, though necessary, will be very painful. As regards
them, I am inclined to think that the more the truth is known, the
more general and the more generous will be the sympathy felt for
their position.</p>
<p>"As the newspaper sent to me, no doubt by your lordship's orders,
from the palace, has been accompanied by no letter, it may be
necessary that your lordship should be troubled by a subpœna, so
as to prove that the newspaper alluded to by your lordship is the
one against which my proceedings will be taken. It will be
necessary, of course, that I should show that the libel in
question has been deemed important enough to bring down upon me
ecclesiastical rebuke of such a nature as to make my remaining in
the diocese unbearable,—unless it is shown that that rebuke was
undeserved."<br/> </p>
<p>There was consternation in the palace when this was received. So
stiffnecked a man, so obstinate, so unclerical,—so determined to
make much of little! The Bishop had felt himself bound to warn a
clergyman that, for the sake of the Church, he could not do
altogether as other men might. No doubt certain ladies had got
around him,—especially Lady Margaret Momson,—filling his ears
with the horrors of the Doctor's proceedings. The gentleman who
had written the article about the Greek and the Latin words had
seen the truth of the thing at once,—so said Lady Margaret. The
Doctor had condoned the offence committed by the Peacockes because
the woman had been beautiful, and was repaying himself for his
mercy by basking in her loveliness. There was no saying that
there was not some truth in this? Mrs. Wortle herself entertained
a feeling of the same kind. It was palpable, on the face of it,
to all except Dr. Wortle himself,—and to Mrs. Peacocke. Mrs.
Stantiloup, who had made her way into the palace, was quite
convincing on this point. Everybody knew, she said, that the
Doctor went across, and saw the lady all alone, every day.
Everybody did not know that. If everybody had been accurate,
everybody would have asserted that he did this thing every other
day. But the matter, as it was represented to the Bishop by the
ladies, with the assistance of one or two clergymen in the Close,
certainly seemed to justify his lordship's interference.</p>
<p>But this that was threatened was very terrible. There was a
determination about the Doctor which made it clear to the Bishop
that he would be as bad as he said. When he, the Bishop, had
spoken of scandal, of course he had not intended to say that the
Doctor's conduct was scandalous; nor had he said anything of the
kind. He had used the word in its proper sense,—and had declared
that offence would be created in the minds of people unless an
injurious report were stopped. "It is not enough to be innocent,"
he had said, "but men must know that we are so." He had declared
in that his belief in Dr. Wortle's innocence. But yet there
might, no doubt, be an action for libel against the newspaper.
And when damages came to be considered, much weight would be
placed naturally on the attention which the Bishop had paid to the
article. The result of this was that the Bishop invited the
Doctor to come and spend a night with him in the palace.</p>
<p>The Doctor went, reaching the palace only just before dinner.
During dinner and in the drawing-room Dr. Wortle made himself very
pleasant. He was a man who could always be soft and gentle in a
drawing-room. To see him talking with Mrs. Rolland and the
Bishop's daughters, you would not have thought that there was
anything wrong with him. The discussion with the Bishop came
after that, and lasted till midnight. "It will be for the
disadvantage of the diocese that this matter should be dragged
into Court,—and for the disadvantage of the Church in general
that a clergyman should seem to seek such redress against his
bishop." So said the Bishop.</p>
<p>But the Doctor was obdurate. "I seek no redress," he said,
"against my bishop. I seek redress against a newspaper which has
calumniated me. It is your good opinion, my lord,—your good
opinion or your ill opinion which is the breath of my nostrils. I
have to refer to you in order that I may show that this paper,
which I should otherwise have despised, has been strong enough to
influence that opinion."</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />