<p><SPAN name="c3" id="c3"></SPAN> </p>
<p> </p>
<h3>CHAPTER III.</h3>
<h4>THE MYSTERY.<br/> </h4>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Mr. Peacocke</span>
himself said that in this matter a great deal of fuss
was made about nothing. Perhaps it was so. He got a ducking,
but, being a strong swimmer, probably suffered no real danger.
The boy, rolling down three or four feet of bank, had then fallen
down six or eight feet into deep water. He might, no doubt, have
been much hurt. He might have struck against a rock and have been
killed,—in which case Mr. Peacocke's prowess would have been of
no avail. But nothing of this kind happened. Little Jack De Lawle
was put to bed in one of the Rectory bed-rooms, and was comforted
with sherry-negus and sweet jelly. For two days he rejoiced
thoroughly in his accident, being freed from school, and subjected
only to caresses. After that he rebelled, having become tired of
his bed. But by that time his mother had been most unnecessarily
summoned. Unless she was wanted to examine the forlorn condition
of his clothes, there was nothing that she could do. But she
came, and, of course, showered blessings on Mr. Peacocke's
head,—while Mrs. Wortle went through to the school and showered
blessings on Mrs. Peacocke. What would they have done had the
Peacockes not been there?</p>
<p>"You must let them have their way, whether for good or bad," the
Doctor said, when his assistant complained rather of the
blessings,—pointing out at any rate their absurdity. "One man is
damned for ever, because, in the conscientious exercise of his
authority, he gives a little boy a rap which happens to make a
small temporary mark on his skin. Another becomes a hero because,
when in the equally conscientious performance of a duty, he gives
himself a ducking. I won't think you a hero; but, of course, I
consider myself very fortunate to have had beside me a man younger
than myself, and quick and ready at such an emergence. Of course
I feel grateful, but I shan't bother you by telling you so."</p>
<p>But this was not the end of it. Lady De Lawle declared that she
could not be happy unless Mr. and Mrs. Peacocke would bring Jack
home for the holidays to De Lawle Park. Of course she carried her
blessings up into Mrs. Peacocke's little drawing-room, and became
quite convinced, as was Mrs. Wortle, that Mrs. Peacocke was in all
respects a lady. She heard of Mr. Peacocke's antecedents at
Oxford, and expressed her opinion that they were charming people.
She could not be happy unless they would promise to come to De
Lawle Park for the holidays. Then Mrs. Peacocke had to explain
that in her present circumstances she did not intend to visit
anywhere. She was very much flattered, and delighted to think that
the dear little boy was none the worse for his accident; but there
must be an end of it. There was something in her manner, as she
said this, which almost overawed Lady De Lawle. She made herself,
at any rate, understood, and no further attempt was made for the
next six weeks to induce her or Mr. Peacocke to enter the Rectory
dining-room. But a good deal was said about Mr.
Peacocke,—generally in his favour.</p>
<p>Generally in his favour,—because he was a fine scholar, and could
swim well. His preaching perhaps did something for him, but the
swimming did more. But though there was so much said of good,
there was something also of evil. A man would not altogether
refuse society for himself and his wife unless there were some
cause for him to do so. He and she must have known themselves to
be unfit to associate with such persons as they would have met at
De Lawle Park. There was a mystery, and the mystery, when
unravelled, would no doubt prove to be very deleterious to the
character of the persons concerned. Mrs. Stantiloup was quite
sure that such must be the case. "It might be very well," said
Mrs. Stantiloup, "for Dr. Wortle to obtain the services of a
well-educated usher for his school, but it became quite another
thing when he put a man up to preach in the church, of whose life,
for five years, no one knew anything." Somebody had told her
something as to the necessity of a bishop's authority for the
appointment of a curate; but no one had strictly defined to her
what a curate is. She was, however, quite ready to declare that
Mr. Peacocke had no business to preach in that pulpit, and that
something very disagreeable would come of it.</p>
<p>Nor was this feeling altogether confined to Mrs. Stantiloup,
though it had perhaps originated with what she had said among her
own friends. "Don't you think it well you should know something
of his life during these five years?" This had been said to the
Rector by the Bishop himself,—who probably would have said
nothing of the kind had not these reports reached his ears. But
reports, when they reach a certain magnitude, and attain a certain
importance, require to be noticed.</p>
<p>So much in this world depends upon character that attention has to
be paid to bad character even when it is not deserved. In dealing
with men and women, we have to consider what they believe, as well
as what we believe ourselves. The utility of a sermon depends
much on the idea that the audience has of the piety of the man who
preaches it. Though the words of God should never have come with
greater power from the mouth of man, they will come in vain if
they be uttered by one who is known as a breaker of the
Commandments;—they will come in vain from the mouth of one who is
even suspected to be so. To all this, when it was said to him by
the Bishop in the kindest manner, Dr. Wortle replied that such
suspicions were monstrous, unreasonable, and uncharitable. He
declared that they originated with that abominable virago, Mrs.
Stantiloup. "Look round the diocese," said the Bishop in reply to
this, "and see if you can find a single clergyman acting in it, of
the details of whose life for the last five years you know
absolutely nothing." Thereupon the Doctor said that he would make
inquiry of Mr. Peacocke himself. It might well be, he thought,
that Mr. Peacocke would not like such inquiry, but the Doctor was
quite sure that any story told to him would be true. On returning
home he found it necessary, or at any rate expedient, to postpone
his questions for a few days. It is not easy to ask a man what he
has been doing with five years of his life, when the question
implies a belief that these five years have been passed badly.
And it was understood that the questioning must in some sort apply
to the man's wife. The Doctor had once said to Mrs. Wortle that
he stood in awe of Mrs. Peacocke. There had certainly come upon
him an idea that she was a lady with whom it would not be easy to
meddle. She was obedient, diligent, and minutely attentive to any
wish that was expressed to her in regard to her duties; but it had
become manifest to the Doctor that in all matters beyond the
school she was independent, and was by no means subject to
external influences. She was not, for instance, very constant in
her own attendance at church, and never seemed to feel it
necessary to apologise for her absence. The Doctor, in his many
and familiar conversations with Mr. Peacocke, had not found
himself able to allude to this; and he had observed that the
husband did not often speak of his own wife unless it were on
matters having reference to the school. So it came to pass that
he dreaded the conversation which he proposed to himself, and
postponed it from day to day with a cowardice which was quite
unusual to him.</p>
<p>And now, O kind-hearted reader, I feel myself constrained, in the
telling of this little story, to depart altogether from those
principles of story-telling to which you probably have become
accustomed, and to put the horse of my romance before the cart.
There is a mystery respecting Mr. and Mrs. Peacocke which,
according to all laws recognised in such matters, ought not to be
elucidated till, let us say, the last chapter but two, so that
your interest should be maintained almost to the end,—so near the
end that there should be left only space for those little
arrangements which are necessary for the well-being, or perhaps
for the evil-being, of our personages. It is my purpose to
disclose the mystery at once, and to ask you to look for your
interest,—should you choose to go on with my chronicle,—simply
in the conduct of my persons, during this disclosure, to others.
You are to know it all before the Doctor or the Bishop,—before
Mrs. Wortle or the Hon. Mrs. Stantiloup, or Lady
<ins class="corr" title="‘de Lawle’ changed to
‘De Lawle’ to conform to majority usage
(11 out of 14 times with uppercase)">De Lawle</ins>.
You are
to know it all before the Peacockes become aware that it must
necessarily be disclosed to any one. It may be that when I shall
have once told the mystery there will no longer be any room for
interest in the tale to you. That there are many such readers of
novels I know. I doubt whether the greater number be not such. I
am far from saying that the kind of interest of which I am
speaking,—and of which I intend to deprive myself,—is not the
most natural and the most efficacious. What would the
<ins class="corr" title="Closing single quotation
mark added">'Black Dwarf'</ins>
be if every one knew from the beginning that he was a rich
man and a baronet?—or 'The Pirate,' if all the truth about Norna
of the Fitful-head had been told in the first chapter? Therefore,
put the book down if the revelation of some future secret be
necessary for your enjoyment. Our mystery is going to be revealed
in the next paragraph,—in the next half-dozen words. Mr. and
Mrs. Peacocke were not man and wife.</p>
<p>The story how it came to be so need not be very long;—nor will
it, as I think, entail any great degree of odious criminality
either upon the man or upon the woman. At St. Louis Mrs. Peacocke
had become acquainted with two brothers named Lefroy, who had come
up from Louisiana, and had achieved for themselves characters
which were by no means desirable. They were sons of a planter who
had been rich in extent of acres and number of slaves before the
war of the Secession. General Lefroy had been in those days a
great man in his State, had held command during the war, and had
been utterly ruined. When the war was over the two boys,—then
seventeen and sixteen years of age,—were old enough to remember
and to regret all that they had lost, to hate the idea of
Abolition, and to feel that the world had nothing left for them
but what was to be got by opposition to the laws of the Union,
which was now hateful to them. They were both handsome, and, in
spite of the sufferings of their State, an attempt had been made
to educate them like gentlemen. But no career of honour had been
open to them, and they had fallen by degrees into dishonour,
dishonesty, and brigandage.</p>
<p>The elder of these, when he was still little more than a
stripling, had married Ella Beaufort, the daughter of another
ruined planter in his State. She had been only sixteen when her
father died, and not seventeen when she married Ferdinand Lefroy.
It was she who afterwards came to England under the name of Mrs.
Peacocke.</p>
<p>Mr. Peacocke was Vice-President of the College at Missouri when he
first saw her, and when he first became acquainted with the two
brothers, each of whom was called Colonel Lefroy. Then there
arose a great scandal in the city as to the treatment which the
wife received from her husband. He was about to go away South,
into Mexico, with the view of pushing his fortune there with
certain desperadoes, who were maintaining a perpetual war against
the authorities of the United States on the borders of Texas, and
he demanded that his wife should accompany him. This she refused
to do, and violence was used to force her. Then it came to pass
that certain persons in St. Louis interfered on her behalf, and
among these was the Reverend Mr. Peacocke, the Vice-President of
the College, upon whose feelings the singular beauty and dignified
demeanour of the woman, no doubt, had had much effect. The man
failed to be powerful over his wife, and then the two brothers
went away together. The woman was left to provide for herself,
and Mr. Peacocke was generous in the aid he gave to her in doing
so.</p>
<p>It may be understood that in this way an intimacy was created, but
it must not be understood that the intimacy was of such a nature
as to be injurious to the fair fame of the lady. Things went on
in this way for two years, during which Mrs. Lefroy's conduct drew
down upon her reproaches from no one. Then there came tidings
that Colonel Lefroy had perished in making one of those raids in
which the two brothers were continually concerned. But which
Colonel Lefroy had perished? If it were the younger brother, that
would be nothing to Mr. Peacocke. If it were the elder, it would
be everything. If Ferdinand Lefroy were dead, he would not
scruple at once to ask the woman to be his wife. That which the
man had done, and that which he had not done, had been of such a
nature as to solve all bonds of affection. She had already
allowed herself to speak of the man as one whose life was a blight
upon her own; and though there had been no word of out-spoken love
from her lips to his ears, he thought that he might succeed if it
could be made certain that Ferdinand Lefroy was no longer among
the living.</p>
<p>"I shall never know," she said in her misery. "What I do hear I
shall never believe. How can one know anything as to what happens
in a country such as that?"</p>
<p>Then he took up his hat and staff, and, vice-president, professor,
and clergyman as he was, started off for the Mexican border. He
did tell her that he was going, but barely told her. "It's a
thing that ought to be found out," he said, "and I want a turn of
travelling. I shall be away three months." She merely bade God
bless him, but said not a word to hinder or to encourage his
going.</p>
<p>He was gone just the three months which he had himself named, and
then returned elate with his news. He had seen the younger
brother, Robert Lefroy, and had learnt from him that the elder
Ferdinand had certainly been killed. Robert had been most
ungracious to him, having even on one occasion threatened his
life; but there had been no doubt that he, Robert, was alive, and
that Ferdinand had been killed by a party of United States
soldiers.</p>
<p>Then the clergyman had his reward, and was accepted by the widow
with a full and happy heart. Not only had her release been
complete, but so was her present joy; and nothing seemed wanting
to their happiness during the six first months after their union.
Then one day, all of a sudden, Ferdinand Lefroy was standing
within her little drawing-room at the College of St. Louis.</p>
<p>Dead? Certainly he was not dead! He did not believe that any one
had said that he was dead! She might be lying or not,—he did not
care; he, Peacocke, certainly had lied;—so said the Colonel. He
did not believe that Peacocke had ever seen his brother Robert.
Robert was dead,—must have been dead, indeed, before the date
given for that interview. The woman was a bigamist,—that is, if
any second marriage had ever been perpetrated. Probably both had
wilfully agreed to the falsehood. For himself he should resolve
at once what steps he meant to take. Then he departed, it being
at that moment after nine in the evening. In the morning he was
gone again, and from that moment they had never either heard of
him or seen him.</p>
<p>How was it to be with them? They could have almost brought
themselves to think it a dream, were it not that others besides
themselves had seen the man, and known that Colonel Ferdinand
Lefroy had been in St. Louis. Then there came to him an idea that
even she might disbelieve the words which he had spoken;—that
even she might think his story to have been false. But to this she
soon put an end. "Dearest," she said, "I never knew a word that
was true to come from his mouth, or a word that was false from
yours."</p>
<p>Should they part? There is no one who reads this but will say
that they should have parted. Every day passed together as man
and wife must be a falsehood and a sin. There would be absolute
misery for both in parting;—but there is no law from God or man
entitling a man to escape from misery at the expense of falsehood
and sin. Though their hearts might have burst in the doing of it,
they should have parted. Though she would have been friendless,
alone, and utterly despicable in the eyes of the world, abandoning
the name which she cherished, as not her own, and going back to
that which she utterly abhorred, still she should have done it.
And he, resolving, as no doubt he would have done under any
circumstances, that he must quit the city of his adoption,—he
should have left her with such material sustenance as her spirit
would have enabled her to accept, should have gone his widowed
way, and endured as best he might the idea that he had left the
woman whom he loved behind, in the desert, all alone! That he had
not done so the reader is aware. That he had lived a life of
sin,—that he and she had continued in one great falsehood,—is
manifest enough. Mrs. Stantiloup, when she hears it all, will
have her triumph. Lady De Lawle's soft heart will rejoice because
that invitation was not accepted. The Bishop will be unutterably
shocked; but, perhaps, to the good man there will be some solace
in the feeling that he had been right in his surmises. How the
Doctor bore it this story is intended to tell,—and how also Mr.
and Mrs. Peacocke bore it, when the sin and the falsehood were
made known to all the world around them. The mystery has at any
rate been told, and they who feel that on this account all hope of
interest is at an end had better put down the book.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />