<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0022" id="link2HCH0022"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XXII——OF CUSTOM, AND THAT WE SHOULD NOT EASILY CHANGE A LAW RECEIVED </h2>
<p>He seems to me to have had a right and true apprehension of the power of
custom, who first invented the story of a country-woman who, having
accustomed herself to play with and carry a young calf in her arms, and
daily continuing to do so as it grew up, obtained this by custom, that,
when grown to be a great ox, she was still able to bear it. For, in truth,
custom is a violent and treacherous schoolmistress. She, by little and
little, slily and unperceived, slips in the foot of her authority, but
having by this gentle and humble beginning, with the benefit of time,
fixed and established it, she then unmasks a furious and tyrannic
countenance, against which we have no more the courage or the power so
much as to lift up our eyes. We see her, at every turn, forcing and
violating the rules of nature:</p>
<p>"Usus efficacissimus rerum omnium magister."<br/>
["Custom is the best master of all things."<br/>
—Pliny, Nat. Hist.,xxvi. 2.]<br/></p>
<p>I refer to her Plato's cave in his Republic, and the physicians, who so
often submit the reasons of their art to her authority; as the story of
that king, who by custom brought his stomach to that pass, as to live by
poison, and the maid that Albertus reports to have lived upon spiders. In
that new world of the Indies, there were found great nations, and in very
differing climates, who were of the same diet, made provision of them, and
fed them for their tables; as also, they did grasshoppers, mice, lizards,
and bats; and in a time of scarcity of such delicacies, a toad was sold
for six crowns, all which they cook, and dish up with several sauces.
There were also others found, to whom our diet, and the flesh we eat, were
venomous and mortal:</p>
<p>"Consuetudinis magna vis est: pernoctant venatores in nive:<br/>
in montibus uri se patiuntur: pugiles, caestibus contusi,<br/>
ne ingemiscunt quidem."<br/>
["The power of custom is very great: huntsmen will lie out all<br/>
night in the snow, or suffer themselves to be burned up by the sun<br/>
on the mountains; boxers, hurt by the caestus, never utter a<br/>
groan."—Cicero, Tusc., ii. 17]<br/></p>
<p>These strange examples will not appear so strange if we consider what we
have ordinary experience of, how much custom stupefies our senses. We need
not go to what is reported of the people about the cataracts of the Nile;
and what philosophers believe of the music of the spheres, that the bodies
of those circles being solid and smooth, and coming to touch and rub upon
one another, cannot fail of creating a marvellous harmony, the changes and
cadences of which cause the revolutions and dances of the stars; but that
the hearing sense of all creatures here below, being universally, like
that of the Egyptians, deafened, and stupefied with the continual noise,
cannot, how great soever, perceive it—[This passage is taken from
Cicero, "Dream of Scipio"; see his De Republica, vi. II. The Egyptians
were said to be stunned by the noise of the Cataracts.]— Smiths,
millers, pewterers, forgemen, and armourers could never be able to live in
the perpetual noise of their own trades, did it strike their ears with the
same violence that it does ours.</p>
<p>My perfumed doublet gratifies my own scent at first; but after I have worn
it three days together, 'tis only pleasing to the bystanders. This is yet
more strange, that custom, notwithstanding long intermissions and
intervals, should yet have the power to unite and establish the effect of
its impressions upon our senses, as is manifest in such as live near unto
steeples and the frequent noise of the bells. I myself lie at home in a
tower, where every morning and evening a very great bell rings out the Ave
Maria: the noise shakes my very tower, and at first seemed insupportable
to me; but I am so used to it, that I hear it without any manner of
offence, and often without awaking at it.</p>
<p>Plato—[Diogenes Laertius, iii. 38. But he whom Plato censured was
not a boy playing at nuts, but a man throwing dice.]—reprehending a
boy for playing at nuts, "Thou reprovest me," says the boy, "for a very
little thing." "Custom," replied Plato, "is no little thing." I find that
our greatest vices derive their first propensity from our most tender
infancy, and that our principal education depends upon the nurse. Mothers
are mightily pleased to see a child writhe off the neck of a chicken, or
to please itself with hurting a dog or a cat; and such wise fathers there
are in the world, who look upon it as a notable mark of a martial spirit,
when they hear a son miscall, or see him domineer over a poor peasant, or
a lackey, that dares not reply, nor turn again; and a great sign of wit,
when they see him cheat and overreach his playfellow by some malicious
treachery and deceit. Yet these are the true seeds and roots of cruelty,
tyranny, and treason; they bud and put out there, and afterwards shoot up
vigorously, and grow to prodigious bulk, cultivated by custom. And it is a
very dangerous mistake to excuse these vile inclinations upon the
tenderness of their age, and the triviality of the subject: first, it is
nature that speaks, whose declaration is then more sincere, and inward
thoughts more undisguised, as it is more weak and young; secondly, the
deformity of cozenage does not consist nor depend upon the difference
betwixt crowns and pins; but I rather hold it more just to conclude thus:
why should he not cozen in crowns since he does it in pins, than as they
do, who say they only play for pins, they would not do it if it were for
money? Children should carefully be instructed to abhor vices for their
own contexture; and the natural deformity of those vices ought so to be
represented to them, that they may not only avoid them in their actions,
but especially so to abominate them in their hearts, that the very thought
should be hateful to them, with what mask soever they may be disguised.</p>
<p>I know very well, for what concerns myself, that from having been brought
up in my childhood to a plain and straightforward way of dealing, and from
having had an aversion to all manner of juggling and foul play in my
childish sports and recreations (and, indeed, it is to be noted, that the
plays of children are not performed in play, but are to be judged in them
as their most serious actions), there is no game so small wherein from my
own bosom naturally, and without study or endeavour, I have not an extreme
aversion from deceit. I shuffle and cut and make as much clatter with the
cards, and keep as strict account for farthings, as it were for double
pistoles; when winning or losing against my wife and daughter, 'tis
indifferent to me, as when I play in good earnest with others, for round
sums. At all times, and in all places, my own eyes are sufficient to look
to my fingers; I am not so narrowly watched by any other, neither is there
any I have more respect to.</p>
<p>I saw the other day, at my own house, a little fellow, a native of Nantes,
born without arms, who has so well taught his feet to perform the services
his hands should have done him, that truly these have half forgotten their
natural office; and, indeed, the fellow calls them his hands; with them he
cuts anything, charges and discharges a pistol, threads a needle, sews,
writes, puts off his hat, combs his head, plays at cards and dice, and all
this with as much dexterity as any other could do who had more, and more
proper limbs to assist him. The money I gave him—for he gains his
living by shewing these feats—he took in his foot, as we do in our
hand. I have seen another who, being yet a boy, flourished a two-handed
sword, and, if I may so say, handled a halberd with the mere motions of
his neck and shoulders for want of hands; tossed them into the air, and
caught them again, darted a dagger, and cracked a whip as well as any
coachman in France.</p>
<p>But the effects of custom are much more manifest in the strange
impressions she imprints in our minds, where she meets with less
resistance. What has she not the power to impose upon our judgments and
beliefs? Is there any so fantastic opinion (omitting the gross impostures
of religions, with which we see so many great nations, and so many
understanding men, so strangely besotted; for this being beyond the reach
of human reason, any error is more excusable in such as are not endued,
through the divine bounty, with an extraordinary illumination from above),
but, of other opinions, are there any so extravagant, that she has not
planted and established for laws in those parts of the world upon which
she has been pleased to exercise her power? And therefore that ancient
exclamation was exceeding just:</p>
<p>"Non pudet physicum, id est speculatorem venatoremque naturae,<br/>
ab animis consuetudine imbutis petere testimonium veritatis?"<br/>
["Is it not a shame for a natural philosopher, that is, for an<br/>
observer and hunter of nature, to seek testimony of the truth from<br/>
minds prepossessed by custom?"—Cicero, De Natura Deor., i. 30.]<br/></p>
<p>I do believe, that no so absurd or ridiculous fancy can enter into human
imagination, that does not meet with some example of public practice, and
that, consequently, our reason does not ground and back up. There are
people, amongst whom it is the fashion to turn their backs upon him they
salute, and never look upon the man they intend to honour. There is a
place, where, whenever the king spits, the greatest ladies of his court
put out their hands to receive it; and another nation, where the most
eminent persons about him stoop to take up his ordure in a linen cloth.
Let us here steal room to insert a story.</p>
<p>A French gentleman was always wont to blow his nose with his fingers (a
thing very much against our fashion), and he justifying himself for so
doing, and he was a man famous for pleasant repartees, he asked me, what
privilege this filthy excrement had, that we must carry about us a fine
handkerchief to receive it, and, which was more, afterwards to lap it
carefully up, and carry it all day about in our pockets, which, he said,
could not but be much more nauseous and offensive, than to see it thrown
away, as we did all other evacuations. I found that what he said was not
altogether without reason, and by being frequently in his company, that
slovenly action of his was at last grown familiar to me; which
nevertheless we make a face at, when we hear it reported of another
country. Miracles appear to be so, according to our ignorance of nature,
and not according to the essence of nature the continually being
accustomed to anything, blinds the eye of our judgment. Barbarians are no
more a wonder to us, than we are to them; nor with any more reason, as
every one would confess, if after having travelled over those remote
examples, men could settle themselves to reflect upon, and rightly to
confer them, with their own. Human reason is a tincture almost equally
infused into all our opinions and manners, of what form soever they are;
infinite in matter, infinite in diversity. But I return to my subject.</p>
<p>There are peoples, where, his wife and children excepted, no one speaks to
the king but through a tube. In one and the same nation, the virgins
discover those parts that modesty should persuade them to hide, and the
married women carefully cover and conceal them. To which, this custom, in
another place, has some relation, where chastity, but in marriage, is of
no esteem, for unmarried women may prostitute themselves to as many as
they please, and being got with child, may lawfully take physic, in the
sight of every one, to destroy their fruit. And, in another place, if a
tradesman marry, all of the same condition, who are invited to the
wedding, lie with the bride before him; and the greater number of them
there is, the greater is her honour, and the opinion of her ability and
strength: if an officer marry, 'tis the same, the same with a labourer, or
one of mean condition; but then it belongs to the lord of the place to
perform that office; and yet a severe loyalty during marriage is afterward
strictly enjoined. There are places where brothels of young men are kept
for the pleasure of women; where the wives go to war as well as the
husbands, and not only share in the dangers of battle, but, moreover, in
the honours of command. Others, where they wear rings not only through
their noses, lips, cheeks, and on their toes, but also weighty gimmals of
gold thrust through their paps and buttocks; where, in eating, they wipe
their fingers upon their thighs, genitories, and the soles of their feet:
where children are excluded, and brothers and nephews only inherit; and
elsewhere, nephews only, saving in the succession of the prince: where,
for the regulation of community in goods and estates, observed in the
country, certain sovereign magistrates have committed to them the
universal charge and overseeing of the agriculture, and distribution of
the fruits, according to the necessity of every one where they lament the
death of children, and feast at the decease of old men: where they lie ten
or twelve in a bed, men and their wives together: where women, whose
husbands come to violent ends, may marry again, and others not: where the
condition of women is looked upon with such contempt, that they kill all
the native females, and buy wives of their neighbours to supply their use;
where husbands may repudiate their wives, without showing any cause, but
wives cannot part from their husbands, for what cause soever; where
husbands may sell their wives in case of sterility; where they boil the
bodies of their dead, and afterward pound them to a pulp, which they mix
with their wine, and drink it; where the most coveted sepulture is to be
eaten by dogs, and elsewhere by birds; where they believe the souls of the
blessed live in all manner of liberty, in delightful fields, furnished
with all sorts of delicacies, and that it is these souls, repeating the
words we utter, which we call Echo; where they fight in the water, and
shoot their arrows with the most mortal aim, swimming; where, for a sign
of subjection, they lift up their shoulders, and hang down their heads;
where they put off their shoes when they enter the king's palace; where
the eunuchs, who take charge of the sacred women, have, moreover, their
lips and noses cut off, that they may not be loved; where the priests put
out their own eyes, to be better acquainted with their demons, and the
better to receive their oracles; where every one makes to himself a deity
of what he likes best; the hunter of a lion or a fox, the fisher of some
fish; idols of every human action or passion; in which place, the sun, the
moon, and the earth are the 'principal deities, and the form of taking an
oath is, to touch the earth, looking up to heaven; where both flesh and
fish is eaten raw; where the greatest oath they take is, to swear by the
name of some dead person of reputation, laying their hand upon his tomb;
where the newyear's gift the king sends every year to the princes, his
vassals, is fire, which being brought, all the old fire is put out, and
the neighbouring people are bound to fetch of the new, every one for
themselves, upon pain of high treason; where, when the king, to betake
himself wholly to devotion, retires from his administration (which often
falls out), his next successor is obliged to do the same, and the right of
the kingdom devolves to the third in succession: where they vary the form
of government, according to the seeming necessity of affairs: depose the
king when they think good, substituting certain elders to govern in his
stead, and sometimes transferring it into the hands of the commonality:
where men and women are both circumcised and also baptized: where the
soldier, who in one or several engagements, has been so fortunate as to
present seven of the enemies' heads to the king, is made noble: where they
live in that rare and unsociable opinion of the mortality of the soul:
where the women are delivered without pain or fear: where the women wear
copper leggings upon both legs, and if a louse bite them, are bound in
magnanimity to bite them again, and dare not marry, till first they have
made their king a tender of their virginity, if he please to accept it:
where the ordinary way of salutation is by putting a finger down to the
earth, and then pointing it up toward heaven: where men carry burdens upon
their heads, and women on their shoulders; where the women make water
standing, and the men squatting: where they send their blood in token of
friendship, and offer incense to the men they would honour, like gods:
where, not only to the fourth, but in any other remote degree, kindred are
not permitted to marry: where the children are four years at nurse, and
often twelve; in which place, also, it is accounted mortal to give the
child suck the first day after it is born: where the correction of the
male children is peculiarly designed to the fathers, and to the mothers of
the girls; the punishment being to hang them by the heels in the smoke:
where they circumcise the women: where they eat all sorts of herbs,
without other scruple than of the badness of the smell: where all things
are open the finest houses, furnished in the richest manner, without
doors, windows, trunks, or chests to lock, a thief being there punished
double what they are in other places: where they crack lice with their
teeth like monkeys, and abhor to see them killed with one's nails: where
in all their lives they neither cut their hair nor pare their nails; and,
in another place, pare those of the right hand only, letting the left grow
for ornament and bravery: where they suffer the hair on the right side to
grow as long as it will, and shave the other; and in the neighbouring
provinces, some let their hair grow long before, and some behind, shaving
close the rest: where parents let out their children, and husbands their
wives, to their guests to hire: where a man may get his own mother with
child, and fathers make use of their own daughters or sons, without
scandal: where, at their solemn feasts, they interchangeably lend their
children to one another, without any consideration of nearness of blood.
In one place, men feed upon human flesh; in another, 'tis reputed a pious
office for a man to kill his father at a certain age; elsewhere, the
fathers dispose of their children, whilst yet in their mothers' wombs,
some to be preserved and carefully brought up, and others to be abandoned
or made away. Elsewhere the old husbands lend their wives to young men;
and in another place they are in common without offence; in one place
particularly, the women take it for a mark of honour to have as many gay
fringed tassels at the bottom of their garment, as they have lain with
several men. Moreover, has not custom made a republic of women separately
by themselves? has it not put arms into their hands, and made them raise
armies and fight battles? And does she not, by her own precept, instruct
the most ignorant vulgar, and make them perfect in things which all the
philosophy in the world could never beat into the heads of the wisest men?
For we know entire nations, where death was not only despised, but
entertained with the greatest triumph; where children of seven years old
suffered themselves to be whipped to death, without changing countenance;
where riches were in such contempt, that the meanest citizen would not
have deigned to stoop to take up a purse of crowns. And we know regions,
very fruitful in all manner of provisions, where, notwithstanding, the
most ordinary diet, and that they are most pleased with, is only bread,
cresses, and water. Did not custom, moreover, work that miracle in Chios
that, in seven hundred years, it was never known that ever maid or wife
committed any act to the prejudice of her honour?</p>
<p>To conclude; there is nothing, in my opinion, that she does not, or may
not do; and therefore, with very good reason it is that Pindar calls her
the ruler of the world. He that was seen to beat his father, and reproved
for so doing, made answer, that it was the custom of their family; that,
in like manner, his father had beaten his grandfather, his grandfather his
great-grandfather, "And this," says he, pointing to his son, "when he
comes to my age, shall beat me." And the father, whom the son dragged and
hauled along the streets, commanded him to stop at a certain door, for he
himself, he said, had dragged his father no farther, that being the utmost
limit of the hereditary outrage the sons used to practise upon the fathers
in their family. It is as much by custom as infirmity, says Aristotle,
that women tear their hair, bite their nails, and eat coals and earth, and
more by custom than nature that men abuse themselves with one another.</p>
<p>The laws of conscience, which we pretend to be derived from nature,
proceed from custom; every one, having an inward veneration for the
opinions and manners approved and received amongst his own people, cannot,
without very great reluctance, depart from them, nor apply himself to them
without applause. In times past, when those of Crete would curse any one,
they prayed the gods to engage him in some ill custom. But the principal
effect of its power is, so to seize and ensnare us, that it is hardly in
us to disengage ourselves from its gripe, or so to come to ourselves, as
to consider of and to weigh the things it enjoins. To say the truth, by
reason that we suck it in with our milk, and that the face of the world
presents itself in this posture to our first sight, it seems as if we were
born upon condition to follow on this track; and the common fancies that
we find in repute everywhere about us, and infused into our minds with the
seed of our fathers, appear to be the most universal and genuine; from
whence it comes to pass, that whatever is off the hinges of custom, is
believed to be also off the hinges of reason; how unreasonably for the
most part, God knows.</p>
<p>If, as we who study ourselves have learned to do, every one who hears a
good sentence, would immediately consider how it does in any way touch his
own private concern, every one would find, that it was not so much a good
saying, as a severe lash to the ordinary stupidity of his own judgment:
but men receive the precepts and admonitions of truth, as directed to the
common sort, and never to themselves; and instead of applying them to
their own manners, do only very ignorantly and unprofitably commit them to
memory. But let us return to the empire of custom.</p>
<p>Such people as have been bred up to liberty, and subject to no other
dominion but the authority of their own will, look upon all other form of
government as monstrous and contrary to nature. Those who are inured to
monarchy do the same; and what opportunity soever fortune presents them
with to change, even then, when with the greatest difficulties they have
disengaged themselves from one master, that was troublesome and grievous
to them, they presently run, with the same difficulties, to create
another; being unable to take into hatred subjection itself.</p>
<p>'Tis by the mediation of custom, that every one is content with the place
where he is planted by nature; and the Highlanders of Scotland no more
pant after Touraine; than the Scythians after Thessaly. Darius asking
certain Greeks what they would take to assume the custom of the Indians,
of eating the dead bodies of their fathers (for that was their use,
believing they could not give them a better nor more noble sepulture than
to bury them in their own bodies), they made answer, that nothing in the
world should hire them to do it; but having also tried to persuade the
Indians to leave their custom, and, after the Greek manner, to burn the
bodies of their fathers, they conceived a still greater horror at the
motion.—[Herodotus, iii. 38.]—Every one does the same, for use
veils from us the true aspect of things.</p>
<p>"Nil adeo magnum, nec tam mirabile quidquam<br/>
Principio, quod non minuant mirarier omnes Paullatim."<br/>
["There is nothing at first so grand, so admirable, which by degrees<br/>
people do not regard with less admiration."—Lucretius, ii. 1027]<br/></p>
<p>Taking upon me once to justify something in use amongst us, and that was
received with absolute authority for a great many leagues round about us,
and not content, as men commonly do, to establish it only by force of law
and example, but inquiring still further into its origin, I found the
foundation so weak, that I who made it my business to confirm others, was
very near being dissatisfied myself. 'Tis by this receipt that Plato
—[Laws, viii. 6.]—undertakes to cure the unnatural and
preposterous loves of his time, as one which he esteems of sovereign
virtue, namely, that the public opinion condemns them; that the poets, and
all other sorts of writers, relate horrible stories of them; a recipe, by
virtue of which the most beautiful daughters no more allure their fathers'
lust; nor brothers, of the finest shape and fashion, their sisters'
desire; the very fables of Thyestes, OEdipus, and Macareus, having with
the harmony of their song, infused this wholesome opinion and belief into
the tender brains of children. Chastity is, in truth, a great and shining
virtue, and of which the utility is sufficiently known; but to treat of
it, and to set it off in its true value, according to nature, is as hard
as 'tis easy to do so according to custom, laws, and precepts. The
fundamental and universal reasons are of very obscure and difficult
research, and our masters either lightly pass them over, or not daring so
much as to touch them, precipitate themselves into the liberty and
protection of custom, there puffing themselves out and triumphing to their
heart's content: such as will not suffer themselves to be withdrawn from
this original source, do yet commit a greater error, and subject
themselves to wild opinions; witness Chrysippus,—[Sextus Empiricus,
Pyyrhon. Hypotyp., i. 14.]—who, in so many of his writings, has
strewed the little account he made of incestuous conjunctions, committed
with how near relations soever.</p>
<p>Whoever would disengage himself from this violent prejudice of custom,
would find several things received with absolute and undoubting opinion,
that have no other support than the hoary head and rivelled face of
ancient usage. But the mask taken off, and things being referred to the
decision of truth and reason, he will find his judgment as it were
altogether overthrown, and yet restored to a much more sure estate. For
example, I shall ask him, what can be more strange than to see a people
obliged to obey laws they never understood; bound in all their domestic
affairs, as marriages, donations, wills, sales, and purchases, to rules
they cannot possibly know, being neither written nor published in their
own language, and of which they are of necessity to purchase both the
interpretation and the use? Not according to the ingenious opinion of
Isocrates,—[Discourse to Nicocles.]—who counselled his king to
make the traffics and negotiations of his subjects, free, frank, and of
profit to them, and their quarrels and disputes burdensome, and laden with
heavy impositions and penalties; but, by a prodigious opinion, to make
sale of reason itself, and to give to laws a course of merchandise. I
think myself obliged to fortune that, as our historians report, it was a
Gascon gentleman, a countryman of mine, who first opposed Charlemagne,
when he attempted to impose upon us Latin and imperial laws.</p>
<p>What can be more savage, than to see a nation where, by lawful custom, the
office of a judge is bought and sold, where judgments are paid for with
ready money, and where justice may legitimately be denied to him that has
not wherewithal to pay; a merchandise in so great repute, as in a
government to create a fourth estate of wrangling lawyers, to add to the
three ancient ones of the church, nobility, and people; which fourth
estate, having the laws in their own hands, and sovereign power over men's
lives and fortunes, makes another body separate from nobility: whence it
comes to pass, that there are double laws, those of honour and those of
justice, in many things altogether opposite one to another; the nobles as
rigorously condemning a lie taken, as the other do a lie revenged: by the
law of arms, he shall be degraded from all nobility and honour who puts up
with an affront; and by the civil law, he who vindicates his reputation by
revenge incurs a capital punishment: he who applies himself to the law for
reparation of an offence done to his honour, disgraces himself; and he who
does not, is censured and punished by the law. Yet of these two so
different things, both of them referring to one head, the one has the
charge of peace, the other of war; those have the profit, these the
honour; those the wisdom, these the virtue; those the word, these the
action; those justice, these valour; those reason, these force; those the
long robe, these the short;—divided betwixt them.</p>
<p>For what concerns indifferent things, as clothes, who is there seeking to
bring them back to their true use, which is the body's service and
convenience, and upon which their original grace and fitness depend; for
the most fantastic, in my opinion, that can be imagined, I will instance
amongst others, our flat caps, that long tail of velvet that hangs down
from our women's heads, with its party-coloured trappings; and that vain
and futile model of a member we cannot in modesty so much as name, which,
nevertheless, we make show and parade of in public. These considerations,
notwithstanding, will not prevail upon any understanding man to decline
the common mode; but, on the contrary, methinks, all singular and
particular fashions are rather marks of folly and vain affectation than of
sound reason, and that a wise man, within, ought to withdraw and retire
his soul from the crowd, and there keep it at liberty and in power to
judge freely of things; but as to externals, absolutely to follow and
conform himself to the fashion of the time. Public society has nothing to
do with our thoughts, but the rest, as our actions, our labours, our
fortunes, and our lives, we are to lend and abandon them to its service
and to the common opinion, as did that good and great Socrates who refused
to preserve his life by a disobedience to the magistrate, though a very
wicked and unjust one for it is the rule of rules, the general law of
laws, that every one observe those of the place wherein he lives.</p>
<p>["It is good to obey the laws of one's country."<br/>
—Excerpta ex Trag. Gyaecis, Grotio interp., 1626, p. 937.]<br/></p>
<p>And now to another point. It is a very great doubt, whether any so
manifest benefit can accrue from the alteration of a law received, let it
be what it will, as there is danger and inconvenience in altering it;
forasmuch as government is a structure composed of divers parts and
members joined and united together, with so strict connection, that it is
impossible to stir so much as one brick or stone, but the whole body will
be sensible of it. The legislator of the Thurians—[Charondas; Diod.
Sic., xii. 24.]—ordained, that whosoever would go about either to
abolish an old law, or to establish a new, should present himself with a
halter about his neck to the people, to the end, that if the innovation he
would introduce should not be approved by every one, he might immediately
be hanged; and he of the Lacedaemonians employed his life to obtain from
his citizens a faithful promise that none of his laws should be violated.—[Lycurgus;
Plutarch, in Vita, c. 22.]—The Ephoros who so rudely cut the two
strings that Phrynis had added to music never stood to examine whether
that addition made better harmony, or that by its means the instrument was
more full and complete; it was enough for him to condemn the invention,
that it was a novelty, and an alteration of the old fashion. Which also is
the meaning of the old rusty sword carried before the magistracy of
Marseilles.</p>
<p>For my own part, I have a great aversion from a novelty, what face or what
pretence soever it may carry along with it, and have reason, having been
an eyewitness of the great evils it has produced. For those which for so
many years have lain so heavy upon us, it is not wholly accountable; but
one may say, with colour enough, that it has accidentally produced and
begotten the mischiefs and ruin that have since happened, both without and
against it; it, principally, we are to accuse for these disorders:</p>
<p>"Heu! patior telis vulnera facta meis."<br/>
["Alas! The wounds were made by my own weapons."<br/>
—Ovid, Ep. Phyll. Demophoonti, vers. 48.]<br/></p>
<p>They who give the first shock to a state, are almost naturally the first
overwhelmed in its ruin the fruits of public commotion are seldom enjoyed
by him who was the first motor; he beats and disturbs the water for
another's net. The unity and contexture of this monarchy, of this grand
edifice, having been ripped and torn in her old age, by this thing called
innovation, has since laid open a rent, and given sufficient admittance to
such injuries: the royal majesty with greater difficulty declines from the
summit to the middle, then it falls and tumbles headlong from the middle
to the bottom. But if the inventors do the greater mischief, the imitators
are more vicious to follow examples of which they have felt and punished
both the horror and the offence. And if there can be any degree of honour
in ill-doing, these last must yield to the others the glory of contriving,
and the courage of making the first attempt. All sorts of new disorders
easily draw, from this primitive and ever-flowing fountain, examples and
precedents to trouble and discompose our government: we read in our very
laws, made for the remedy of this first evil, the beginning and pretences
of all sorts of wicked enterprises; and that befalls us, which Thucydides
said of the civil wars of his time, that, in favour of public vices, they
gave them new and more plausible names for their excuse, sweetening and
disguising their true titles; which must be done, forsooth, to reform our
conscience and belief:</p>
<p>"Honesta oratio est;"<br/>
["Fine words truly."—Ter. And., i. I, 114.]<br/></p>
<p>but the best pretence for innovation is of very dangerous consequence:</p>
<p>"Aden nihil motum ex antiquo probabile est."<br/>
["We are ever wrong in changing ancient ways."—Livy, xxxiv. 54]<br/></p>
<p>And freely to speak my thoughts, it argues a strange self-love and great
presumption to be so fond of one's own opinions, that a public peace must
be overthrown to establish them, and to introduce so many inevitable
mischiefs, and so dreadful a corruption of manners, as a civil war and the
mutations of state consequent to it, always bring in their train, and to
introduce them, in a thing of so high concern, into the bowels of one's
own country. Can there be worse husbandry than to set up so many certain
and knowing vices against errors that are only contested and disputable?
And are there any worse sorts of vices than those committed against a
man's own conscience, and the natural light of his own reason? The Senate,
upon the dispute betwixt it and the people about the administration of
their religion, was bold enough to return this evasion for current pay:</p>
<p>"Ad deos id magis, quam ad se, pertinere: ipsos visuros,<br/>
ne sacra sua polluantur;"<br/>
["Those things belong to the gods to determine than to them; let the<br/>
gods, therefore, take care that their sacred mysteries were not<br/>
profaned."—Livy, x. 6.]<br/></p>
<p>according to what the oracle answered to those of Delphos who, fearing to
be invaded by the Persians in the Median war, inquired of Apollo, how they
should dispose of the holy treasure of his temple; whether they should
hide, or remove it to some other place? He returned them answer, that they
should stir nothing from thence, and only take care of themselves, for he
was sufficient to look to what belonged to him. —[Herodotus, viii.
36.].—</p>
<p>The Christian religion has all the marks of the utmost utility and
justice: but none more manifest than the severe injunction it lays
indifferently upon all to yield absolute obedience to the civil
magistrate, and to maintain and defend the laws. Of which, what a
wonderful example has the divine wisdom left us, that, to establish the
salvation of mankind, and to conduct His glorious victory over death and
sin, would do it after no other way, but at the mercy of our ordinary
forms of justice subjecting the progress and issue of so high and so
salutiferous an effect, to the blindness and injustice of our customs and
observances; sacrificing the innocent blood of so many of His elect, and
so long a loss of so many years, to the maturing of this inestimable
fruit? There is a vast difference betwixt the case of one who follows the
forms and laws of his country, and of another who will undertake to
regulate and change them; of whom the first pleads simplicity, obedience,
and example for his excuse, who, whatever he shall do, it cannot be
imputed to malice; 'tis at the worst but misfortune:</p>
<p>"Quis est enim, quem non moveat clarissimis monumentis<br/>
testata consignataque antiquitas?"<br/>
["For who is there that antiquity, attested and confirmed by the<br/>
fairest monuments, cannot move?"—Cicero, De Divin., i. 40.]<br/></p>
<p>besides what Isocrates says, that defect is nearer allied to moderation
than excess: the other is a much more ruffling gamester; for whosoever
shall take upon him to choose and alter, usurps the authority of judging,
and should look well about him, and make it his business to discern
clearly the defect of what he would abolish, and the virtue of what he is
about to introduce.</p>
<p>This so vulgar consideration is that which settled me in my station, and
kept even my most extravagant and ungoverned youth under the rein, so as
not to burden my shoulders with so great a weight, as to render myself
responsible for a science of that importance, and in this to dare, what in
my better and more mature judgment, I durst not do in the most easy and
indifferent things I had been instructed in, and wherein the temerity of
judging is of no consequence at all; it seeming to me very unjust to go
about to subject public and established customs and institutions, to the
weakness and instability of a private and particular fancy (for private
reason has but a private jurisdiction), and to attempt that upon the
divine, which no government will endure a man should do, upon the civil
laws; with which, though human reason has much more commerce than with the
other, yet are they sovereignly judged by their own proper judges, and the
extreme sufficiency serves only to expound and set forth the law and
custom received, and neither to wrest it, nor to introduce anything, of
innovation. If, sometimes, the divine providence has gone beyond the rules
to which it has necessarily bound and obliged us men, it is not to give us
any dispensation to do the same; those are masterstrokes of the divine
hand, which we are not to imitate, but to admire, and extraordinary
examples, marks of express and particular purposes, of the nature of
miracles, presented before us for manifestations of its almightiness,
equally above both our rules and force, which it would be folly and
impiety to attempt to represent and imitate; and that we ought not to
follow, but to contemplate with the greatest reverence: acts of His
personage, and not for us. Cotta very opportunely declares:</p>
<p>"Quum de religione agitur, Ti. Coruncanium, P. Scipionem,<br/>
P. Scaevolam, pontifices maximos, non Zenonem, aut Cleanthem,<br/>
aut Chrysippum, sequor."<br/>
["When matter of religion is in question, I follow the high priests<br/>
T. Coruncanius, P. Scipio, P. Scaevola, and not Zeno, Cleanthes, or<br/>
Chrysippus."—Cicero, De Natura Deor., iii. 2.]<br/></p>
<p>God knows, in the present quarrel of our civil war, where there are a
hundred articles to dash out and to put in, great and very considerable,
how many there are who can truly boast, they have exactly and perfectly
weighed and understood the grounds and reasons of the one and the other
party; 'tis a number, if they make any number, that would be able to give
us very little disturbance. But what becomes of all the rest, under what
ensigns do they march, in what quarter do they lie? Theirs have the same
effect with other weak and ill-applied medicines; they have only set the
humours they would purge more violently in work, stirred and exasperated
by the conflict, and left them still behind. The potion was too weak to
purge, but strong enough to weaken us; so that it does not work, but we
keep it still in our bodies, and reap nothing from the operation but
intestine gripes and dolours.</p>
<p>So it is, nevertheless, that Fortune still reserving her authority in
defiance of whatever we are able to do or say, sometimes presents us with
a necessity so urgent, that 'tis requisite the laws should a little yield
and give way; and when one opposes the increase of an innovation that thus
intrudes itself by violence, to keep a man's self in so doing, in all
places and in all things within bounds and rules against those who have
the power, and to whom all things are lawful that may in any way serve to
advance their design, who have no other law nor rule but what serves best
to their own purpose, 'tis a dangerous obligation and an intolerable
inequality:</p>
<p>"Aditum nocendi perfido praestat fides,"<br/>
["Putting faith in a treacherous person, opens the door to<br/>
harm."—Seneca, OEdip., act iii., verse 686.]<br/></p>
<p>forasmuch as the ordinary discipline of a healthful state does not provide
against these extraordinary accidents; it presupposes a body that supports
itself in its principal members and offices, and a common consent to its
obedience and observation. A legitimate proceeding is cold, heavy, and
constrained, and not fit to make head against a headstrong and unbridled
proceeding. 'Tis known to be to this day cast in the dish of those two
great men, Octavius and Cato, in the two civil wars of Sylla and Caesar,
that they would rather suffer their country to undergo the last
extremities, than relieve their fellow-citizens at the expense of its
laws, or be guilty of any innovation; for in truth, in these last
necessities, where there is no other remedy, it would, peradventure, be
more discreetly done, to stoop and yield a little to receive the blow,
than, by opposing without possibility of doing good, to give occasion to
violence to trample all under foot; and better to make the laws do what
they can, when they cannot do what they would. After this manner did he—[Agesilaus.]—who
suspended them for four-and-twenty hours, and he who, for once shifted a
day in the calendar, and that other—[Alexander the Great.]—who
of the month of June made a second of May. The Lacedaemonians themselves,
who were so religious observers of the laws of their country, being
straitened by one of their own edicts, by which it was expressly forbidden
to choose the same man twice to be admiral; and on the other side, their
affairs necessarily requiring, that Lysander should again take upon him
that command, they made one Aratus admiral; 'tis true, but withal,
Lysander went general of the navy; and, by the same subtlety, one of their
ambassadors being sent to the Athenians to obtain the revocation of some
decree, and Pericles remonstrating to him, that it was forbidden to take
away the tablet wherein a law had once been engrossed, he advised him to
turn it only, that being not forbidden; and Plutarch commends Philopoemen,
that being born to command, he knew how to do it, not only according to
the laws, but also to overrule even the laws themselves, when the public
necessity so required.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />