<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0005" id="link2HCH0005"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER V——WHETHER THE GOVERNOR OF A PLACE BESIEGED OUGHT HIMSELF TO GO OUT TO PARLEY </h2>
<p>Quintus Marcius, the Roman legate in the war against Perseus, King of
Macedon, to gain time wherein to reinforce his army, set on foot some
overtures of accommodation, with which the king being lulled asleep,
concluded a truce for some days, by this means giving his enemy
opportunity and leisure to recruit his forces, which was afterwards the
occasion of the king's final ruin. Yet the elder senators, mindful of
their forefathers' manners, condemned this proceeding as degenerating from
their ancient practice, which, they said, was to fight by valour, and not
by artifice, surprises, and night-encounters; neither by pretended flight
nor unexpected rallies to overcome their enemies; never making war till
having first proclaimed it, and very often assigned both the hour and
place of battle. Out of this generous principle it was that they delivered
up to Pyrrhus his treacherous physician, and to the Etrurians their
disloyal schoolmaster. This was, indeed, a procedure truly Roman, and
nothing allied to the Grecian subtlety, nor to the Punic cunning, where it
was reputed a victory of less glory to overcome by force than by fraud.
Deceit may serve for a need, but he only confesses himself overcome who
knows he is neither subdued by policy nor misadventure, but by dint of
valour, man to man, in a fair and just war. It very well appears, by the
discourse of these good old senators, that this fine sentence was not yet
received amongst them.</p>
<p>"Dolus, an virtus, quis in hoste requirat?"<br/>
["What matters whether by valour or by strategem we overcome the<br/>
enemy?"—Aeneid, ii. 390]<br/></p>
<p>The Achaians, says Polybius, abhorred all manner of double-dealing in war,
not reputing it a victory unless where the courage of the enemy was fairly
subdued:</p>
<p>"Eam vir sanctus et sapiens sciet veram esse victoriam, quae, salva fide
et integra dignitate, parabitur."—["An honest and prudent man will
acknowledge that only to be a true victory which shall be obtained saving
his own good faith and dignity."—Florus, i. 12.]—Says another:</p>
<p>"Vosne velit, an me, regnare hera, quidve ferat,<br/>
fors virtute experiamur."<br/>
["Whether you or I shall rule, or what shall happen, let us<br/>
determine by valour."—Cicero, De Offic., i. 12]<br/></p>
<p>In the kingdom of Ternate, amongst those nations which we so broadly call
barbarians, they have a custom never to commence war, till it be first
proclaimed; adding withal an ample declaration of what means they have to
do it with, with what and how many men, what ammunitions, and what, both
offensive and defensive, arms; but also, that being done, if their enemies
do not yield and come to an agreement, they conceive it lawful to employ
without reproach in their wars any means which may help them to conquer.</p>
<p>The ancient Florentines were so far from seeking to obtain any advantage
over their enemies by surprise, that they always gave them a month's
warning before they drew their army into the field, by the continual
tolling of a bell they called Martinella.—[After St. Martin.]</p>
<p>For what concerns ourselves, who are not so scrupulous in this affair, and
who attribute the honour of the war to him who has the profit of it, and
who after Lysander say, "Where the lion's skin is too short, we must eke
it out with a bit from that of a fox"; the most usual occasions of
surprise are derived from this practice, and we hold that there are no
moments wherein a chief ought to be more circumspect, and to have his eye
so much at watch, as those of parleys and treaties of accommodation; and
it is, therefore, become a general rule amongst the martial men of these
latter times, that a governor of a place never ought, in a time of siege,
to go out to parley. It was for this that in our fathers' days the
Seigneurs de Montmord and de l'Assigni, defending Mousson against the
Count of Nassau, were so highly censured. But yet, as to this, it would be
excusable in that governor who, going out, should, notwithstanding, do it
in such manner that the safety and advantage should be on his side; as
Count Guido di Rangone did at Reggio (if we are to believe Du Bellay, for
Guicciardini says it was he himself) when the Seigneur de l'Escut
approached to parley, who stepped so little away from his fort, that a
disorder happening in the interim of parley, not only Monsieur de l'Escut
and his party who were advanced with him, found themselves by much the
weaker, insomuch that Alessandro Trivulcio was there slain, but he himself
follow the Count, and, relying upon his honour, to secure himself from the
danger of the shot within the walls of the town.</p>
<p>Eumenes, being shut up in the city of Nora by Antigonus, and by him
importuned to come out to speak with him, as he sent him word it was fit
he should to a greater man than himself, and one who had now an advantage
over him, returned this noble answer. "Tell him," said he, "that I shall
never think any man greater than myself whilst I have my sword in my
hand," and would not consent to come out to him till first, according to
his own demand, Antigonus had delivered him his own nephew Ptolomeus in
hostage.</p>
<p>And yet some have done very well in going out in person to parley, on the
word of the assailant: witness Henry de Vaux, a cavalier of Champagne, who
being besieged by the English in the Castle of Commercy, and Bartholomew
de Brunes, who commanded at the Leaguer, having so sapped the greatest
part of the castle without, that nothing remained but setting fire to the
props to bury the besieged under the ruins, he requested the said Henry to
come out to speak with him for his own good, which he did with three more
in company; and, his ruin being made apparent to him, he conceived himself
singularly obliged to his enemy, to whose discretion he and his garrison
surrendered themselves; and fire being presently applied to the mine, the
props no sooner began to fail, but the castle was immediately blown up
from its foundations, no one stone being left upon another.</p>
<p>I could, and do, with great facility, rely upon the faith of another; but
I should very unwillingly do it in such a case, as it should thereby be
judged that it was rather an effect of my despair and want of courage than
voluntarily and out of confidence and security in the faith of him with
whom I had to do.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />