<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0016" id="link2H_4_0016"></SPAN></p>
<h2> THE DOMAIN OF ARNHEIM </h2>
<p>The garden like a lady fair was cut,<br/>
That lay as if she slumbered in delight,<br/>
And to the open skies her eyes did shut.<br/>
The azure fields of Heaven were 'sembled right<br/>
In a large round, set with the flowers of light.<br/>
The flowers de luce, and the round sparks of dew.<br/>
That hung upon their azure leaves did shew<br/>
Like twinkling stars that sparkle in the evening blue.<br/>
Giles Fletcher.<br/></p>
<p>FROM his cradle to his grave a gale of prosperity bore my friend Ellison
along. Nor do I use the word prosperity in its mere worldly sense. I mean
it as synonymous with happiness. The person of whom I speak seemed born
for the purpose of foreshadowing the doctrines of Turgot, Price,
Priestley, and Condorcet—of exemplifying by individual instance what
has been deemed the chimera of the perfectionists. In the brief existence
of Ellison I fancy that I have seen refuted the dogma, that in man's very
nature lies some hidden principle, the antagonist of bliss. An anxious
examination of his career has given me to understand that in general, from
the violation of a few simple laws of humanity arises the wretchedness of
mankind—that as a species we have in our possession the as yet
unwrought elements of content—and that, even now, in the present
darkness and madness of all thought on the great question of the social
condition, it is not impossible that man, the individual, under certain
unusual and highly fortuitous conditions, may be happy.</p>
<p>With opinions such as these my young friend, too, was fully imbued, and
thus it is worthy of observation that the uninterrupted enjoyment which
distinguished his life was, in great measure, the result of preconcert. It
is indeed evident that with less of the instinctive philosophy which, now
and then, stands so well in the stead of experience, Mr. Ellison would
have found himself precipitated, by the very extraordinary success of his
life, into the common vortex of unhappiness which yawns for those of
pre-eminent endowments. But it is by no means my object to pen an essay on
happiness. The ideas of my friend may be summed up in a few words. He
admitted but four elementary principles, or more strictly, conditions of
bliss. That which he considered chief was (strange to say!) the simple and
purely physical one of free exercise in the open air. "The health," he
said, "attainable by other means is scarcely worth the name." He instanced
the ecstasies of the fox-hunter, and pointed to the tillers of the earth,
the only people who, as a class, can be fairly considered happier than
others. His second condition was the love of woman. His third, and most
difficult of realization, was the contempt of ambition. His fourth was an
object of unceasing pursuit; and he held that, other things being equal,
the extent of attainable happiness was in proportion to the spirituality
of this object.</p>
<p>Ellison was remarkable in the continuous profusion of good gifts lavished
upon him by fortune. In personal grace and beauty he exceeded all men. His
intellect was of that order to which the acquisition of knowledge is less
a labor than an intuition and a necessity. His family was one of the most
illustrious of the empire. His bride was the loveliest and most devoted of
women. His possessions had been always ample; but on the attainment of his
majority, it was discovered that one of those extraordinary freaks of fate
had been played in his behalf which startle the whole social world amid
which they occur, and seldom fail radically to alter the moral
constitution of those who are their objects.</p>
<p>It appears that about a hundred years before Mr. Ellison's coming of age,
there had died, in a remote province, one Mr. Seabright Ellison. This
gentleman had amassed a princely fortune, and, having no immediate
connections, conceived the whim of suffering his wealth to accumulate for
a century after his decease. Minutely and sagaciously directing the
various modes of investment, he bequeathed the aggregate amount to the
nearest of blood, bearing the name of Ellison, who should be alive at the
end of the hundred years. Many attempts had been made to set aside this
singular bequest; their ex post facto character rendered them abortive;
but the attention of a jealous government was aroused, and a legislative
act finally obtained, forbidding all similar accumulations. This act,
however, did not prevent young Ellison from entering into possession, on
his twenty-first birthday, as the heir of his ancestor Seabright, of a
fortune of four hundred and fifty millions of dollars. (*1)</p>
<p>When it had become known that such was the enormous wealth inherited,
there were, of course, many speculations as to the mode of its disposal.
The magnitude and the immediate availability of the sum bewildered all who
thought on the topic. The possessor of any appreciable amount of money
might have been imagined to perform any one of a thousand things. With
riches merely surpassing those of any citizen, it would have been easy to
suppose him engaging to supreme excess in the fashionable extravagances of
his time—or busying himself with political intrigue—or aiming
at ministerial power—or purchasing increase of nobility—or
collecting large museums of virtu—or playing the munificent patron
of letters, of science, of art—or endowing, and bestowing his name
upon extensive institutions of charity. But for the inconceivable wealth
in the actual possession of the heir, these objects and all ordinary
objects were felt to afford too limited a field. Recourse was had to
figures, and these but sufficed to confound. It was seen that, even at
three per cent., the annual income of the inheritance amounted to no less
than thirteen millions and five hundred thousand dollars; which was one
million and one hundred and twenty-five thousand per month; or thirty-six
thousand nine hundred and eighty-six per day; or one thousand five hundred
and forty-one per hour; or six and twenty dollars for every minute that
flew. Thus the usual track of supposition was thoroughly broken up. Men
knew not what to imagine. There were some who even conceived that Mr.
Ellison would divest himself of at least one-half of his fortune, as of
utterly superfluous opulence—enriching whole troops of his relatives
by division of his superabundance. To the nearest of these he did, in
fact, abandon the very unusual wealth which was his own before the
inheritance.</p>
<p>I was not surprised, however, to perceive that he had long made up his
mind on a point which had occasioned so much discussion to his friends.
Nor was I greatly astonished at the nature of his decision. In regard to
individual charities he had satisfied his conscience. In the possibility
of any improvement, properly so called, being effected by man himself in
the general condition of man, he had (I am sorry to confess it) little
faith. Upon the whole, whether happily or unhappily, he was thrown back,
in very great measure, upon self.</p>
<p>In the widest and noblest sense he was a poet. He comprehended, moreover,
the true character, the august aims, the supreme majesty and dignity of
the poetic sentiment. The fullest, if not the sole proper satisfaction of
this sentiment he instinctively felt to lie in the creation of novel forms
of beauty. Some peculiarities, either in his early education, or in the
nature of his intellect, had tinged with what is termed materialism all
his ethical speculations; and it was this bias, perhaps, which led him to
believe that the most advantageous at least, if not the sole legitimate
field for the poetic exercise, lies in the creation of novel moods of
purely physical loveliness. Thus it happened he became neither musician
nor poet—if we use this latter term in its every-day acceptation. Or
it might have been that he neglected to become either, merely in pursuance
of his idea that in contempt of ambition is to be found one of the
essential principles of happiness on earth. Is it not indeed, possible
that, while a high order of genius is necessarily ambitious, the highest
is above that which is termed ambition? And may it not thus happen that
many far greater than Milton have contentedly remained "mute and
inglorious?" I believe that the world has never seen—and that,
unless through some series of accidents goading the noblest order of mind
into distasteful exertion, the world will never see—that full extent
of triumphant execution, in the richer domains of art, of which the human
nature is absolutely capable.</p>
<p>Ellison became neither musician nor poet; although no man lived more
profoundly enamored of music and poetry. Under other circumstances than
those which invested him, it is not impossible that he would have become a
painter. Sculpture, although in its nature rigorously poetical was too
limited in its extent and consequences, to have occupied, at any time,
much of his attention. And I have now mentioned all the provinces in which
the common understanding of the poetic sentiment has declared it capable
of expatiating. But Ellison maintained that the richest, the truest, and
most natural, if not altogether the most extensive province, had been
unaccountably neglected. No definition had spoken of the
landscape-gardener as of the poet; yet it seemed to my friend that the
creation of the landscape-garden offered to the proper Muse the most
magnificent of opportunities. Here, indeed, was the fairest field for the
display of imagination in the endless combining of forms of novel beauty;
the elements to enter into combination being, by a vast superiority, the
most glorious which the earth could afford. In the multiform and
multicolor of the flowers and the trees, he recognised the most direct and
energetic efforts of Nature at physical loveliness. And in the direction
or concentration of this effort—or, more properly, in its adaptation
to the eyes which were to behold it on earth—he perceived that he
should be employing the best means—laboring to the greatest
advantage—in the fulfilment, not only of his own destiny as poet,
but of the august purposes for which the Deity had implanted the poetic
sentiment in man.</p>
<p>"Its adaptation to the eyes which were to behold it on earth." In his
explanation of this phraseology, Mr. Ellison did much toward solving what
has always seemed to me an enigma:—I mean the fact (which none but
the ignorant dispute) that no such combination of scenery exists in nature
as the painter of genius may produce. No such paradises are to be found in
reality as have glowed on the canvas of Claude. In the most enchanting of
natural landscapes, there will always be found a defect or an excess—many
excesses and defects. While the component parts may defy, individually,
the highest skill of the artist, the arrangement of these parts will
always be susceptible of improvement. In short, no position can be
attained on the wide surface of the natural earth, from which an
artistical eye, looking steadily, will not find matter of offence in what
is termed the "composition" of the landscape. And yet how unintelligible
is this! In all other matters we are justly instructed to regard nature as
supreme. With her details we shrink from competition. Who shall presume to
imitate the colors of the tulip, or to improve the proportions of the lily
of the valley? The criticism which says, of sculpture or portraiture, that
here nature is to be exalted or idealized rather than imitated, is in
error. No pictorial or sculptural combinations of points of human
liveliness do more than approach the living and breathing beauty. In
landscape alone is the principle of the critic true; and, having felt its
truth here, it is but the headlong spirit of generalization which has led
him to pronounce it true throughout all the domains of art. Having, I say,
felt its truth here; for the feeling is no affectation or chimera. The
mathematics afford no more absolute demonstrations than the sentiments of
his art yields the artist. He not only believes, but positively knows,
that such and such apparently arbitrary arrangements of matter constitute
and alone constitute the true beauty. His reasons, however, have not yet
been matured into expression. It remains for a more profound analysis than
the world has yet seen, fully to investigate and express them.
Nevertheless he is confirmed in his instinctive opinions by the voice of
all his brethren. Let a "composition" be defective; let an emendation be
wrought in its mere arrangement of form; let this emendation be submitted
to every artist in the world; by each will its necessity be admitted. And
even far more than this:—in remedy of the defective composition,
each insulated member of the fraternity would have suggested the identical
emendation.</p>
<p>I repeat that in landscape arrangements alone is the physical nature
susceptible of exaltation, and that, therefore, her susceptibility of
improvement at this one point, was a mystery I had been unable to solve.
My own thoughts on the subject had rested in the idea that the primitive
intention of nature would have so arranged the earth's surface as to have
fulfilled at all points man's sense of perfection in the beautiful, the
sublime, or the picturesque; but that this primitive intention had been
frustrated by the known geological disturbances—disturbances of form
and color—grouping, in the correction or allaying of which lies the
soul of art. The force of this idea was much weakened, however, by the
necessity which it involved of considering the disturbances abnormal and
unadapted to any purpose. It was Ellison who suggested that they were
prognostic of death. He thus explained:—Admit the earthly
immortality of man to have been the first intention. We have then the
primitive arrangement of the earth's surface adapted to his blissful
estate, as not existent but designed. The disturbances were the
preparations for his subsequently conceived deathful condition.</p>
<p>"Now," said my friend, "what we regard as exaltation of the landscape may
be really such, as respects only the moral or human point of view. Each
alteration of the natural scenery may possibly effect a blemish in the
picture, if we can suppose this picture viewed at large—in mass—from
some point distant from the earth's surface, although not beyond the
limits of its atmosphere. It is easily understood that what might improve
a closely scrutinized detail, may at the same time injure a general or
more distantly observed effect. There may be a class of beings, human
once, but now invisible to humanity, to whom, from afar, our disorder may
seem order—our unpicturesqueness picturesque, in a word, the
earth-angels, for whose scrutiny more especially than our own, and for
whose death-refined appreciation of the beautiful, may have been set
in array by God the wide landscape-gardens of the hemispheres."</p>
<p>In the course of discussion, my friend quoted some passages from a writer
on landscape-gardening who has been supposed to have well treated his
theme:</p>
<p>"There are properly but two styles of landscape-gardening, the natural and
the artificial. One seeks to recall the original beauty of the country, by
adapting its means to the surrounding scenery, cultivating trees in
harmony with the hills or plain of the neighboring land; detecting and
bringing into practice those nice relations of size, proportion, and color
which, hid from the common observer, are revealed everywhere to the
experienced student of nature. The result of the natural style of
gardening, is seen rather in the absence of all defects and incongruities—in
the prevalence of a healthy harmony and order—than in the creation
of any special wonders or miracles. The artificial style has as many
varieties as there are different tastes to gratify. It has a certain
general relation to the various styles of building. There are the stately
avenues and retirements of Versailles; Italian terraces; and a various
mixed old English style, which bears some relation to the domestic Gothic
or English Elizabethan architecture. Whatever may be said against the
abuses of the artificial landscape-gardening, a mixture of pure art in a
garden scene adds to it a great beauty. This is partly pleasing to the
eye, by the show of order and design, and partly moral. A terrace, with an
old moss-covered balustrade, calls up at once to the eye the fair forms
that have passed there in other days. The slightest exhibition of art is
an evidence of care and human interest."</p>
<p>"From what I have already observed," said Ellison, "you will understand
that I reject the idea, here expressed, of recalling the original beauty
of the country. The original beauty is never so great as that which may be
introduced. Of course, every thing depends on the selection of a spot with
capabilities. What is said about detecting and bringing into practice nice
relations of size, proportion, and color, is one of those mere vaguenesses
of speech which serve to veil inaccuracy of thought. The phrase quoted may
mean any thing, or nothing, and guides in no degree. That the true result
of the natural style of gardening is seen rather in the absence of all
defects and incongruities than in the creation of any special wonders or
miracles, is a proposition better suited to the grovelling apprehension of
the herd than to the fervid dreams of the man of genius. The negative
merit suggested appertains to that hobbling criticism which, in letters,
would elevate Addison into apotheosis. In truth, while that virtue which
consists in the mere avoidance of vice appeals directly to the
understanding, and can thus be circumscribed in rule, the loftier virtue,
which flames in creation, can be apprehended in its results alone. Rule
applies but to the merits of denial—to the excellencies which
refrain. Beyond these, the critical art can but suggest. We may be
instructed to build a "Cato," but we are in vain told how to conceive a
Parthenon or an "Inferno." The thing done, however; the wonder
accomplished; and the capacity for apprehension becomes universal. The
sophists of the negative school who, through inability to create, have
scoffed at creation, are now found the loudest in applause. What, in its
chrysalis condition of principle, affronted their demure reason, never
fails, in its maturity of accomplishment, to extort admiration from their
instinct of beauty.</p>
<p>"The author's observations on the artificial style," continued Ellison,
"are less objectionable. A mixture of pure art in a garden scene adds to
it a great beauty. This is just; as also is the reference to the sense of
human interest. The principle expressed is incontrovertible—but
there may be something beyond it. There may be an object in keeping with
the principle—an object unattainable by the means ordinarily
possessed by individuals, yet which, if attained, would lend a charm to
the landscape-garden far surpassing that which a sense of merely human
interest could bestow. A poet, having very unusual pecuniary resources,
might, while retaining the necessary idea of art or culture, or, as our
author expresses it, of interest, so imbue his designs at once with extent
and novelty of beauty, as to convey the sentiment of spiritual
interference. It will be seen that, in bringing about such result, he
secures all the advantages of interest or design, while relieving his work
of the harshness or technicality of the worldly art. In the most rugged of
wildernesses—in the most savage of the scenes of pure nature—there
is apparent the art of a creator; yet this art is apparent to reflection
only; in no respect has it the obvious force of a feeling. Now let us
suppose this sense of the Almighty design to be one step depressed—to
be brought into something like harmony or consistency with the sense of
human art—to form an intermedium between the two:—let us
imagine, for example, a landscape whose combined vastness and
definitiveness—whose united beauty, magnificence, and strangeness,
shall convey the idea of care, or culture, or superintendence, on the part
of beings superior, yet akin to humanity—then the sentiment of
interest is preserved, while the art intervolved is made to assume the air
of an intermediate or secondary nature—a nature which is not God,
nor an emanation from God, but which still is nature in the sense of the
handiwork of the angels that hover between man and God."</p>
<p>It was in devoting his enormous wealth to the embodiment of a vision such
as this—in the free exercise in the open air ensured by the personal
superintendence of his plans—in the unceasing object which these
plans afforded—in the high spirituality of the object—in the
contempt of ambition which it enabled him truly to feel—in the
perennial springs with which it gratified, without possibility of
satiating, that one master passion of his soul, the thirst for beauty,
above all, it was in the sympathy of a woman, not unwomanly, whose
loveliness and love enveloped his existence in the purple atmosphere of
Paradise, that Ellison thought to find, and found, exemption from the
ordinary cares of humanity, with a far greater amount of positive
happiness than ever glowed in the rapt day-dreams of De Stael.</p>
<p>I despair of conveying to the reader any distinct conception of the
marvels which my friend did actually accomplish. I wish to describe, but
am disheartened by the difficulty of description, and hesitate between
detail and generality. Perhaps the better course will be to unite the two
in their extremes.</p>
<p>Mr. Ellison's first step regarded, of course, the choice of a locality,
and scarcely had he commenced thinking on this point, when the luxuriant
nature of the Pacific Islands arrested his attention. In fact, he had made
up his mind for a voyage to the South Seas, when a night's reflection
induced him to abandon the idea. "Were I misanthropic," he said, "such a
locale would suit me. The thoroughness of its insulation and seclusion,
and the difficulty of ingress and egress, would in such case be the charm
of charms; but as yet I am not Timon. I wish the composure but not the
depression of solitude. There must remain with me a certain control over
the extent and duration of my repose. There will be frequent hours in
which I shall need, too, the sympathy of the poetic in what I have done.
Let me seek, then, a spot not far from a populous city—whose
vicinity, also, will best enable me to execute my plans."</p>
<p>In search of a suitable place so situated, Ellison travelled for several
years, and I was permitted to accompany him. A thousand spots with which I
was enraptured he rejected without hesitation, for reasons which satisfied
me, in the end, that he was right. We came at length to an elevated
table-land of wonderful fertility and beauty, affording a panoramic
prospect very little less in extent than that of Aetna, and, in Ellison's
opinion as well as my own, surpassing the far-famed view from that
mountain in all the true elements of the picturesque.</p>
<p>"I am aware," said the traveller, as he drew a sigh of deep delight after
gazing on this scene, entranced, for nearly an hour, "I know that here, in
my circumstances, nine-tenths of the most fastidious of men would rest
content. This panorama is indeed glorious, and I should rejoice in it but
for the excess of its glory. The taste of all the architects I have ever
known leads them, for the sake of 'prospect,' to put up buildings on
hill-tops. The error is obvious. Grandeur in any of its moods, but
especially in that of extent, startles, excites—and then fatigues,
depresses. For the occasional scene nothing can be better—for the
constant view nothing worse. And, in the constant view, the most
objectionable phase of grandeur is that of extent; the worst phase of
extent, that of distance. It is at war with the sentiment and with the
sense of seclusion—the sentiment and sense which we seek to humor in
'retiring to the country.' In looking from the summit of a mountain we
cannot help feeling abroad in the world. The heart-sick avoid distant
prospects as a pestilence."</p>
<p>It was not until toward the close of the fourth year of our search that we
found a locality with which Ellison professed himself satisfied. It is, of
course, needless to say where was the locality. The late death of my
friend, in causing his domain to be thrown open to certain classes of
visiters, has given to Arnheim a species of secret and subdued if not
solemn celebrity, similar in kind, although infinitely superior in degree,
to that which so long distinguished Fonthill.</p>
<p>The usual approach to Arnheim was by the river. The visiter left the city
in the early morning. During the forenoon he passed between shores of a
tranquil and domestic beauty, on which grazed innumerable sheep, their
white fleeces spotting the vivid green of rolling meadows. By degrees the
idea of cultivation subsided into that of merely pastoral care. This
slowly became merged in a sense of retirement—this again in a
consciousness of solitude. As the evening approached, the channel grew
more narrow, the banks more and more precipitous; and these latter were
clothed in rich, more profuse, and more sombre foliage. The water
increased in transparency. The stream took a thousand turns, so that at no
moment could its gleaming surface be seen for a greater distance than a
furlong. At every instant the vessel seemed imprisoned within an enchanted
circle, having insuperable and impenetrable walls of foliage, a roof of
ultramarine satin, and no floor—the keel balancing itself with
admirable nicety on that of a phantom bark which, by some accident having
been turned upside down, floated in constant company with the substantial
one, for the purpose of sustaining it. The channel now became a gorge—although
the term is somewhat inapplicable, and I employ it merely because the
language has no word which better represents the most striking—not
the most distinctive—feature of the scene. The character of gorge
was maintained only in the height and parallelism of the shores; it was
lost altogether in their other traits. The walls of the ravine (through
which the clear water still tranquilly flowed) arose to an elevation of a
hundred and occasionally of a hundred and fifty feet, and inclined so much
toward each other as, in a great measure, to shut out the light of day;
while the long plume-like moss which depended densely from the
intertwining shrubberies overhead, gave the whole chasm an air of funereal
gloom. The windings became more frequent and intricate, and seemed often
as if returning in upon themselves, so that the voyager had long lost all
idea of direction. He was, moreover, enwrapt in an exquisite sense of the
strange. The thought of nature still remained, but her character seemed to
have undergone modification, there was a weird symmetry, a thrilling
uniformity, a wizard propriety in these her works. Not a dead branch—not
a withered leaf—not a stray pebble—not a patch of the brown
earth was anywhere visible. The crystal water welled up against the clean
granite, or the unblemished moss, with a sharpness of outline that
delighted while it bewildered the eye.</p>
<p>Having threaded the mazes of this channel for some hours, the gloom
deepening every moment, a sharp and unexpected turn of the vessel brought
it suddenly, as if dropped from heaven, into a circular basin of very
considerable extent when compared with the width of the gorge. It was
about two hundred yards in diameter, and girt in at all points but one—that
immediately fronting the vessel as it entered—by hills equal in
general height to the walls of the chasm, although of a thoroughly
different character. Their sides sloped from the water's edge at an angle
of some forty-five degrees, and they were clothed from base to summit—not
a perceptible point escaping—in a drapery of the most gorgeous
flower-blossoms; scarcely a green leaf being visible among the sea of
odorous and fluctuating color. This basin was of great depth, but so
transparent was the water that the bottom, which seemed to consist of a
thick mass of small round alabaster pebbles, was distinctly visible by
glimpses—that is to say, whenever the eye could permit itself not to
see, far down in the inverted heaven, the duplicate blooming of the hills.
On these latter there were no trees, nor even shrubs of any size. The
impressions wrought on the observer were those of richness, warmth, color,
quietude, uniformity, softness, delicacy, daintiness, voluptuousness, and
a miraculous extremeness of culture that suggested dreams of a new race of
fairies, laborious, tasteful, magnificent, and fastidious; but as the eye
traced upward the myriad-tinted slope, from its sharp junction with the
water to its vague termination amid the folds of overhanging cloud, it
became, indeed, difficult not to fancy a panoramic cataract of rubies,
sapphires, opals, and golden onyxes, rolling silently out of the sky.</p>
<p>The visiter, shooting suddenly into this bay from out the gloom of the
ravine, is delighted but astounded by the full orb of the declining sun,
which he had supposed to be already far below the horizon, but which now
confronts him, and forms the sole termination of an otherwise limitless
vista seen through another chasm-like rift in the hills.</p>
<p>But here the voyager quits the vessel which has borne him so far, and
descends into a light canoe of ivory, stained with arabesque devices in
vivid scarlet, both within and without. The poop and beak of this boat
arise high above the water, with sharp points, so that the general form is
that of an irregular crescent. It lies on the surface of the bay with the
proud grace of a swan. On its ermined floor reposes a single feathery
paddle of satin-wood; but no oarsmen or attendant is to be seen. The guest
is bidden to be of good cheer—that the fates will take care of him.
The larger vessel disappears, and he is left alone in the canoe, which
lies apparently motionless in the middle of the lake. While he considers
what course to pursue, however, he becomes aware of a gentle movement in
the fairy bark. It slowly swings itself around until its prow points
toward the sun. It advances with a gentle but gradually accelerated
velocity, while the slight ripples it creates seem to break about the
ivory side in divinest melody-seem to offer the only possible explanation
of the soothing yet melancholy music for whose unseen origin the
bewildered voyager looks around him in vain.</p>
<p>The canoe steadily proceeds, and the rocky gate of the vista is
approached, so that its depths can be more distinctly seen. To the right
arise a chain of lofty hills rudely and luxuriantly wooded. It is
observed, however, that the trait of exquisite cleanness where the bank
dips into the water, still prevails. There is not one token of the usual
river debris. To the left the character of the scene is softer and more
obviously artificial. Here the bank slopes upward from the stream in a
very gentle ascent, forming a broad sward of grass of a texture resembling
nothing so much as velvet, and of a brilliancy of green which would bear
comparison with the tint of the purest emerald. This plateau varies in
width from ten to three hundred yards; reaching from the river-bank to a
wall, fifty feet high, which extends, in an infinity of curves, but
following the general direction of the river, until lost in the distance
to the westward. This wall is of one continuous rock, and has been formed
by cutting perpendicularly the once rugged precipice of the stream's
southern bank, but no trace of the labor has been suffered to remain. The
chiselled stone has the hue of ages, and is profusely overhung and
overspread with the ivy, the coral honeysuckle, the eglantine, and the
clematis. The uniformity of the top and bottom lines of the wall is fully
relieved by occasional trees of gigantic height, growing singly or in
small groups, both along the plateau and in the domain behind the wall,
but in close proximity to it; so that frequent limbs (of the black walnut
especially) reach over and dip their pendent extremities into the water.
Farther back within the domain, the vision is impeded by an impenetrable
screen of foliage.</p>
<p>These things are observed during the canoe's gradual approach to what I
have called the gate of the vista. On drawing nearer to this, however, its
chasm-like appearance vanishes; a new outlet from the bay is discovered to
the left—in which direction the wall is also seen to sweep, still
following the general course of the stream. Down this new opening the eye
cannot penetrate very far; for the stream, accompanied by the wall, still
bends to the left, until both are swallowed up by the leaves.</p>
<p>The boat, nevertheless, glides magically into the winding channel; and
here the shore opposite the wall is found to resemble that opposite the
wall in the straight vista. Lofty hills, rising occasionally into
mountains, and covered with vegetation in wild luxuriance, still shut in
the scene.</p>
<p>Floating gently onward, but with a velocity slightly augmented, the
voyager, after many short turns, finds his progress apparently barred by a
gigantic gate or rather door of burnished gold, elaborately carved and
fretted, and reflecting the direct rays of the now fast-sinking sun with
an effulgence that seems to wreath the whole surrounding forest in flames.
This gate is inserted in the lofty wall; which here appears to cross the
river at right angles. In a few moments, however, it is seen that the main
body of the water still sweeps in a gentle and extensive curve to the
left, the wall following it as before, while a stream of considerable
volume, diverging from the principal one, makes its way, with a slight
ripple, under the door, and is thus hidden from sight. The canoe falls
into the lesser channel and approaches the gate. Its ponderous wings are
slowly and musically expanded. The boat glides between them, and commences
a rapid descent into a vast amphitheatre entirely begirt with purple
mountains, whose bases are laved by a gleaming river throughout the full
extent of their circuit. Meantime the whole Paradise of Arnheim bursts
upon the view. There is a gush of entrancing melody; there is an
oppressive sense of strange sweet odor,—there is a dream-like
intermingling to the eye of tall slender Eastern trees—bosky
shrubberies—flocks of golden and crimson birds—lily-fringed
lakes—meadows of violets, tulips, poppies, hyacinths, and tuberoses—long
intertangled lines of silver streamlets—and, upspringing confusedly
from amid all, a mass of semi-Gothic, semi-Saracenic architecture
sustaining itself by miracle in mid-air, glittering in the red sunlight
with a hundred oriels, minarets, and pinnacles; and seeming the phantom
handiwork, conjointly, of the Sylphs, of the Fairies, of the Genii and of
the Gnomes.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />