<p><br/> <SPAN name="linkpurloin" id="linkpurloin"></SPAN> <br/></p>
<h2> THE PURLOINED LETTER </h2>
<p>Nil sapientiae odiosius acumine nimio.<br/>
<br/>
<i>Seneca</i>.<br/></p>
<p>At Paris, just after dark one gusty evening in the autumn of 18-, I was
enjoying the twofold luxury of meditation and a meerschaum, in company
with my friend C. Auguste Dupin, in his little back library, or
book-closet, au troisi�me, No. 33, Rue Dun�t, Faubourg St. Germain. For
one hour at least we had maintained a profound silence; while each, to any
casual observer, might have seemed intently and exclusively occupied with
the curling eddies of smoke that oppressed the atmosphere of the chamber.
For myself, however, I was mentally discussing certain topics which had
formed matter for conversation between us at an earlier period of the
evening; I mean the affair of the Rue Morgue, and the mystery attending
the murder of Marie Rog�t. I looked upon it, therefore, as something of a
coincidence, when the door of our apartment was thrown open and admitted
our old acquaintance, Monsieur G—, the Prefect of the Parisian
police.</p>
<p>We gave him a hearty welcome; for there was nearly half as much of the
entertaining as of the contemptible about the man, and we had not seen him
for several years. We had been sitting in the dark, and Dupin now arose
for the purpose of lighting a lamp, but sat down again, without doing so,
upon G.'s saying that he had called to consult us, or rather to ask the
opinion of my friend, about some official business which had occasioned a
great deal of trouble.</p>
<p>"If it is any point requiring reflection," observed Dupin, as he forebore
to enkindle the wick, "we shall examine it to better purpose in the dark."</p>
<p>"That is another of your odd notions," said the Prefect, who had a fashion
of calling every thing "odd" that was beyond his comprehension, and thus
lived amid an absolute legion of "oddities."</p>
<p>"Very true," said Dupin, as he supplied his visiter with a pipe, and
rolled towards him a comfortable chair.</p>
<p>"And what is the difficulty now?" I asked. "Nothing more in the
assassination way, I hope?"</p>
<p>"Oh no; nothing of that nature. The fact is, the business is very simple
indeed, and I make no doubt that we can manage it sufficiently well
ourselves; but then I thought Dupin would like to hear the details of it,
because it is so excessively odd."</p>
<p>"Simple and odd," said Dupin.</p>
<p>"Why, yes; and not exactly that, either. The fact is, we have all been a
good deal puzzled because the affair is so simple, and yet baffles us
altogether."</p>
<p>"Perhaps it is the very simplicity of the thing which puts you at fault,"
said my friend.</p>
<p>"What nonsense you do talk!" replied the Prefect, laughing heartily.</p>
<p>"Perhaps the mystery is a little too plain," said Dupin.</p>
<p>"Oh, good heavens! who ever heard of such an idea?"</p>
<p>"A little too self-evident."</p>
<p>"Ha! ha! ha—ha! ha! ha!—ho! ho! ho!" roared our visiter,
profoundly amused, "oh, Dupin, you will be the death of me yet!"</p>
<p>"And what, after all, is the matter on hand?" I asked.</p>
<p>"Why, I will tell you," replied the Prefect, as he gave a long, steady and
contemplative puff, and settled himself in his chair. "I will tell you in
a few words; but, before I begin, let me caution you that this is an
affair demanding the greatest secrecy, and that I should most probably
lose the position I now hold, were it known that I confided it to any
one."</p>
<p>"Proceed," said I.</p>
<p>"Or not," said Dupin.</p>
<p>"Well, then; I have received personal information, from a very high
quarter, that a certain document of the last importance, has been
purloined from the royal apartments. The individual who purloined it is
known; this beyond a doubt; he was seen to take it. It is known, also,
that it still remains in his possession."</p>
<p>"How is this known?" asked Dupin.</p>
<p>"It is clearly inferred," replied the Prefect, "from the nature of the
document, and from the non-appearance of certain results which would at
once arise from its passing out of the robber's possession; that is to
say, from his employing it as he must design in the end to employ it."</p>
<p>"Be a little more explicit," I said.</p>
<p>"Well, I may venture so far as to say that the paper gives its holder a
certain power in a certain quarter where such power is immensely
valuable." The Prefect was fond of the cant of diplomacy.</p>
<p>"Still I do not quite understand," said Dupin.</p>
<p>"No? Well; the disclosure of the document to a third person, who shall be
nameless, would bring in question the honor of a personage of most exalted
station; and this fact gives the holder of the document an ascendancy over
the illustrious personage whose honor and peace are so jeopardized."</p>
<p>"But this ascendancy," I interposed, "would depend upon the robber's
knowledge of the loser's knowledge of the robber. Who would dare—"</p>
<p>"The thief," said G., "is the Minister D—, who dares all things,
those unbecoming as well as those becoming a man. The method of the theft
was not less ingenious than bold. The document in question—a letter,
to be frank—had been received by the personage robbed while alone in
the royal boudoir. During its perusal she was suddenly interrupted by the
entrance of the other exalted personage from whom especially it was her
wish to conceal it. After a hurried and vain endeavor to thrust it in a
drawer, she was forced to place it, open as it was, upon a table. The
address, however, was uppermost, and, the contents thus unexposed, the
letter escaped notice. At this juncture enters the Minister D—. His
lynx eye immediately perceives the paper, recognises the handwriting of
the address, observes the confusion of the personage addressed, and
fathoms her secret. After some business transactions, hurried through in
his ordinary manner, he produces a letter somewhat similar to the one in
question, opens it, pretends to read it, and then places it in close
juxtaposition to the other. Again he converses, for some fifteen minutes,
upon the public affairs. At length, in taking leave, he takes also from
the table the letter to which he had no claim. Its rightful owner saw,
but, of course, dared not call attention to the act, in the presence of
the third personage who stood at her elbow. The minister decamped; leaving
his own letter—one of no importance—upon the table."</p>
<p>"Here, then," said Dupin to me, "you have precisely what you demand to
make the ascendancy complete—the robber's knowledge of the loser's
knowledge of the robber."</p>
<p>"Yes," replied the Prefect; "and the power thus attained has, for some
months past, been wielded, for political purposes, to a very dangerous
extent. The personage robbed is more thoroughly convinced, every day, of
the necessity of reclaiming her letter. But this, of course, cannot be
done openly. In fine, driven to despair, she has committed the matter to
me."</p>
<p>"Than whom," said Dupin, amid a perfect whirlwind of smoke, "no more
sagacious agent could, I suppose, be desired, or even imagined."</p>
<p>"You flatter me," replied the Prefect; "but it is possible that some such
opinion may have been entertained."</p>
<p>"It is clear," said I, "as you observe, that the letter is still in
possession of the minister; since it is this possession, and not any
employment of the letter, which bestows the power. With the employment the
power departs."</p>
<p>"True," said G.; "and upon this conviction I proceeded. My first care was
to make thorough search of the minister's hotel; and here my chief
embarrassment lay in the necessity of searching without his knowledge.
Beyond all things, I have been warned of the danger which would result
from giving him reason to suspect our design."</p>
<p>"But," said I, "you are quite au fait in these investigations. The
Parisian police have done this thing often before."</p>
<p>"O yes; and for this reason I did not despair. The habits of the minister
gave me, too, a great advantage. He is frequently absent from home all
night. His servants are by no means numerous. They sleep at a distance
from their master's apartment, and, being chiefly Neapolitans, are readily
made drunk. I have keys, as you know, with which I can open any chamber or
cabinet in Paris. For three months a night has not passed, during the
greater part of which I have not been engaged, personally, in ransacking
the D— Hotel. My honor is interested, and, to mention a great
secret, the reward is enormous. So I did not abandon the search until I
had become fully satisfied that the thief is a more astute man than
myself. I fancy that I have investigated every nook and corner of the
premises in which it is possible that the paper can be concealed."</p>
<p>"But is it not possible," I suggested, "that although the letter may be in
possession of the minister, as it unquestionably is, he may have concealed
it elsewhere than upon his own premises?"</p>
<p>"This is barely possible," said Dupin. "The present peculiar condition of
affairs at court, and especially of those intrigues in which D— is
known to be involved, would render the instant availability of the
document—its susceptibility of being produced at a moment's notice—a
point of nearly equal importance with its possession."</p>
<p>"Its susceptibility of being produced?" said I.</p>
<p>"That is to say, of being destroyed," said Dupin.</p>
<p>"True," I observed; "the paper is clearly then upon the premises. As for
its being upon the person of the minister, we may consider that as out of
the question."</p>
<p>"Entirely," said the Prefect. "He has been twice waylaid, as if by
footpads, and his person rigorously searched under my own inspection."</p>
<p>"You might have spared yourself this trouble," said Dupin. "D—, I
presume, is not altogether a fool, and, if not, must have anticipated
these waylayings, as a matter of course."</p>
<p>"Not altogether a fool," said G., "but then he's a poet, which I take to
be only one remove from a fool."</p>
<p>"True," said Dupin, after a long and thoughtful whiff from his meerschaum,
"although I have been guilty of certain doggrel myself."</p>
<p>"Suppose you detail," said I, "the particulars of your search."</p>
<p>"Why the fact is, we took our time, and we searched every where. I have
had long experience in these affairs. I took the entire building, room by
room; devoting the nights of a whole week to each. We examined, first, the
furniture of each apartment. We opened every possible drawer; and I
presume you know that, to a properly trained police agent, such a thing as
a secret drawer is impossible. Any man is a dolt who permits a 'secret'
drawer to escape him in a search of this kind. The thing is so plain.
There is a certain amount of bulk—of space—to be accounted for
in every cabinet. Then we have accurate rules. The fiftieth part of a line
could not escape us. After the cabinets we took the chairs. The cushions
we probed with the fine long needles you have seen me employ. From the
tables we removed the tops."</p>
<p>"Why so?"</p>
<p>"Sometimes the top of a table, or other similarly arranged piece of
furniture, is removed by the person wishing to conceal an article; then
the leg is excavated, the article deposited within the cavity, and the top
replaced. The bottoms and tops of bedposts are employed in the same way."</p>
<p>"But could not the cavity be detected by sounding?" I asked.</p>
<p>"By no means, if, when the article is deposited, a sufficient wadding of
cotton be placed around it. Besides, in our case, we were obliged to
proceed without noise."</p>
<p>"But you could not have removed—you could not have taken to pieces
all articles of furniture in which it would have been possible to make a
deposit in the manner you mention. A letter may be compressed into a thin
spiral roll, not differing much in shape or bulk from a large
knitting-needle, and in this form it might be inserted into the rung of a
chair, for example. You did not take to pieces all the chairs?"</p>
<p>"Certainly not; but we did better—we examined the rungs of every
chair in the hotel, and, indeed the jointings of every description of
furniture, by the aid of a most powerful microscope. Had there been any
traces of recent disturbance we should not have failed to detect it
instantly. A single grain of gimlet-dust, for example, would have been as
obvious as an apple. Any disorder in the glueing—any unusual gaping
in the joints—would have sufficed to insure detection."</p>
<p>"I presume you looked to the mirrors, between the boards and the plates,
and you probed the beds and the bed-clothes, as well as the curtains and
carpets."</p>
<p>"That of course; and when we had absolutely completed every particle of
the furniture in this way, then we examined the house itself. We divided
its entire surface into compartments, which we numbered, so that none
might be missed; then we scrutinized each individual square inch
throughout the premises, including the two houses immediately adjoining,
with the microscope, as before."</p>
<p>"The two houses adjoining!" I exclaimed; "you must have had a great deal
of trouble."</p>
<p>"We had; but the reward offered is prodigious!"</p>
<p>"You include the grounds about the houses?"</p>
<p>"All the grounds are paved with brick. They gave us comparatively little
trouble. We examined the moss between the bricks, and found it
undisturbed."</p>
<p>"You looked among D—'s papers, of course, and into the books of the
library?"</p>
<p>"Certainly; we opened every package and parcel; we not only opened every
book, but we turned over every leaf in each volume, not contenting
ourselves with a mere shake, according to the fashion of some of our
police officers. We also measured the thickness of every book-cover, with
the most accurate admeasurement, and applied to each the most jealous
scrutiny of the microscope. Had any of the bindings been recently meddled
with, it would have been utterly impossible that the fact should have
escaped observation. Some five or six volumes, just from the hands of the
binder, we carefully probed, longitudinally, with the needles."</p>
<p>"You explored the floors beneath the carpets?"</p>
<p>"Beyond doubt. We removed every carpet, and examined the boards with the
microscope."</p>
<p>"And the paper on the walls?"</p>
<p>"Yes."</p>
<p>"You looked into the cellars?"</p>
<p>"We did."</p>
<p>"Then," I said, "you have been making a miscalculation, and the letter is
not upon the premises, as you suppose."</p>
<p>"I fear you are right there," said the Prefect. "And now, Dupin, what
would you advise me to do?"</p>
<p>"To make a thorough re-search of the premises."</p>
<p>"That is absolutely needless," replied G—. "I am not more sure that
I breathe than I am that the letter is not at the Hotel."</p>
<p>"I have no better advice to give you," said Dupin. "You have, of course,
an accurate description of the letter?"</p>
<p>"Oh yes!"—And here the Prefect, producing a memorandum-book
proceeded to read aloud a minute account of the internal, and especially
of the external appearance of the missing document. Soon after finishing
the perusal of this description, he took his departure, more entirely
depressed in spirits than I had ever known the good gentleman before. In
about a month afterwards he paid us another visit, and found us occupied
very nearly as before. He took a pipe and a chair and entered into some
ordinary conversation. At length I said,—</p>
<p>"Well, but G—, what of the purloined letter? I presume you have at
last made up your mind that there is no such thing as overreaching the
Minister?"</p>
<p>"Confound him, say I—yes; I made the re-examination, however, as
Dupin suggested—but it was all labor lost, as I knew it would be."</p>
<p>"How much was the reward offered, did you say?" asked Dupin.</p>
<p>"Why, a very great deal—a very liberal reward—I don't like to
say how much, precisely; but one thing I will say, that I wouldn't mind
giving my individual check for fifty thousand francs to any one who could
obtain me that letter. The fact is, it is becoming of more and more
importance every day; and the reward has been lately doubled. If it were
trebled, however, I could do no more than I have done."</p>
<p>"Why, yes," said Dupin, drawlingly, between the whiffs of his meerschaum,
"I really—think, G—, you have not exerted yourself—to
the utmost in this matter. You might—do a little more, I think, eh?"</p>
<p>"How?—in what way?'</p>
<p>"Why—puff, puff—you might—puff, puff—employ
counsel in the matter, eh?—puff, puff, puff. Do you remember the
story they tell of Abernethy?"</p>
<p>"No; hang Abernethy!"</p>
<p>"To be sure! hang him and welcome. But, once upon a time, a certain rich
miser conceived the design of spunging upon this Abernethy for a medical
opinion. Getting up, for this purpose, an ordinary conversation in a
private company, he insinuated his case to the physician, as that of an
imaginary individual.</p>
<p>"'We will suppose,' said the miser, 'that his symptoms are such and such;
now, doctor, what would you have directed him to take?'</p>
<p>"'Take!' said Abernethy, 'why, take advice, to be sure.'"</p>
<p>"But," said the Prefect, a little discomposed, "I am perfectly willing to
take advice, and to pay for it. I would really give fifty thousand francs
to any one who would aid me in the matter."</p>
<p>"In that case," replied Dupin, opening a drawer, and producing a
check-book, "you may as well fill me up a check for the amount mentioned.
When you have signed it, I will hand you the letter."</p>
<p>I was astounded. The Prefect appeared absolutely thunder-stricken. For
some minutes he remained speechless and motionless, looking incredulously
at my friend with open mouth, and eyes that seemed starting from their
sockets; then, apparently recovering himself in some measure, he seized a
pen, and after several pauses and vacant stares, finally filled up and
signed a check for fifty thousand francs, and handed it across the table
to Dupin. The latter examined it carefully and deposited it in his
pocket-book; then, unlocking an escritoire, took thence a letter and gave
it to the Prefect. This functionary grasped it in a perfect agony of joy,
opened it with a trembling hand, cast a rapid glance at its contents, and
then, scrambling and struggling to the door, rushed at length
unceremoniously from the room and from the house, without having uttered a
syllable since Dupin had requested him to fill up the check.</p>
<p>When he had gone, my friend entered into some explanations.</p>
<p>"The Parisian police," he said, "are exceedingly able in their way. They
are persevering, ingenious, cunning, and thoroughly versed in the
knowledge which their duties seem chiefly to demand. Thus, when G—
detailed to us his mode of searching the premises at the Hotel D—, I
felt entire confidence in his having made a satisfactory investigation—so
far as his labors extended."</p>
<p>"So far as his labors extended?" said I.</p>
<p>"Yes," said Dupin. "The measures adopted were not only the best of their
kind, but carried out to absolute perfection. Had the letter been
deposited within the range of their search, these fellows would, beyond a
question, have found it."</p>
<p>I merely laughed—but he seemed quite serious in all that he said.</p>
<p>"The measures, then," he continued, "were good in their kind, and well
executed; their defect lay in their being inapplicable to the case, and to
the man. A certain set of highly ingenious resources are, with the
Prefect, a sort of Procrustean bed, to which he forcibly adapts his
designs. But he perpetually errs by being too deep or too shallow, for the
matter in hand; and many a schoolboy is a better reasoner than he. I knew
one about eight years of age, whose success at guessing in the game of
'even and odd' attracted universal admiration. This game is simple, and is
played with marbles. One player holds in his hand a number of these toys,
and demands of another whether that number is even or odd. If the guess is
right, the guesser wins one; if wrong, he loses one. The boy to whom I
allude won all the marbles of the school. Of course he had some principle
of guessing; and this lay in mere observation and admeasurement of the
astuteness of his opponents. For example, an arrant simpleton is his
opponent, and, holding up his closed hand, asks, 'are they even or odd?'
Our schoolboy replies, 'odd,' and loses; but upon the second trial he
wins, for he then says to himself, 'the simpleton had them even upon the
first trial, and his amount of cunning is just sufficient to make him have
them odd upon the second; I will therefore guess odd;'—he guesses
odd, and wins. Now, with a simpleton a degree above the first, he would
have reasoned thus: 'This fellow finds that in the first instance I
guessed odd, and, in the second, he will propose to himself, upon the
first impulse, a simple variation from even to odd, as did the first
simpleton; but then a second thought will suggest that this is too simple
a variation, and finally he will decide upon putting it even as before. I
will therefore guess even;'—he guesses even, and wins. Now this mode
of reasoning in the schoolboy, whom his fellows termed 'lucky,'—what,
in its last analysis, is it?"</p>
<p>"It is merely," I said, "an identification of the reasoner's intellect
with that of his opponent."</p>
<p>"It is," said Dupin; "and, upon inquiring of the boy by what means he
effected the thorough identification in which his success consisted, I
received answer as follows: 'When I wish to find out how wise, or how
stupid, or how good, or how wicked is any one, or what are his thoughts at
the moment, I fashion the expression of my face, as accurately as
possible, in accordance with the expression of his, and then wait to see
what thoughts or sentiments arise in my mind or heart, as if to match or
correspond with the expression.' This response of the schoolboy lies at
the bottom of all the spurious profundity which has been attributed to
Rochefoucault, to La Bougive, to Machiavelli, and to Campanella."</p>
<p>"And the identification," I said, "of the reasoner's intellect with that
of his opponent, depends, if I understand you aright, upon the accuracy
with which the opponent's intellect is admeasured."</p>
<p>"For its practical value it depends upon this," replied Dupin; "and the
Prefect and his cohort fail so frequently, first, by default of this
identification, and, secondly, by ill-admeasurement, or rather through
non-admeasurement, of the intellect with which they are engaged. They
consider only their own ideas of ingenuity; and, in searching for anything
hidden, advert only to the modes in which they would have hidden it. They
are right in this much—that their own ingenuity is a faithful
representative of that of the mass; but when the cunning of the individual
felon is diverse in character from their own, the felon foils them, of
course. This always happens when it is above their own, and very usually
when it is below. They have no variation of principle in their
investigations; at best, when urged by some unusual emergency—by
some extraordinary reward—they extend or exaggerate their old modes
of practice, without touching their principles. What, for example, in this
case of D—, has been done to vary the principle of action? What is
all this boring, and probing, and sounding, and scrutinizing with the
microscope and dividing the surface of the building into registered square
inches—what is it all but an exaggeration of the application of the
one principle or set of principles of search, which are based upon the one
set of notions regarding human ingenuity, to which the Prefect, in the
long routine of his duty, has been accustomed? Do you not see he has taken
it for granted that all men proceed to conceal a letter,—not exactly
in a gimlet hole bored in a chair-leg—but, at least, in some
out-of-the-way hole or corner suggested by the same tenor of thought which
would urge a man to secrete a letter in a gimlet-hole bored in a
chair-leg? And do you not see also, that such recherch�s nooks for
concealment are adapted only for ordinary occasions, and would be adopted
only by ordinary intellects; for, in all cases of concealment, a disposal
of the article concealed—a disposal of it in this recherch� manner,—is,
in the very first instance, presumable and presumed; and thus its
discovery depends, not at all upon the acumen, but altogether upon the
mere care, patience, and determination of the seekers; and where the case
is of importance—or, what amounts to the same thing in the policial
eyes, when the reward is of magnitude,—the qualities in question
have never been known to fail. You will now understand what I meant in
suggesting that, had the purloined letter been hidden any where within the
limits of the Prefect's examination—in other words, had the
principle of its concealment been comprehended within the principles of
the Prefect—its discovery would have been a matter altogether beyond
question. This functionary, however, has been thoroughly mystified; and
the remote source of his defeat lies in the supposition that the Minister
is a fool, because he has acquired renown as a poet. All fools are poets;
this the Prefect feels; and he is merely guilty of a non distributio medii
in thence inferring that all poets are fools."</p>
<p>"But is this really the poet?" I asked. "There are two brothers, I know;
and both have attained reputation in letters. The Minister I believe has
written learnedly on the Differential Calculus. He is a mathematician, and
no poet."</p>
<p>"You are mistaken; I know him well; he is both. As poet and mathematician,
he would reason well; as mere mathematician, he could not have reasoned at
all, and thus would have been at the mercy of the Prefect."</p>
<p>"You surprise me," I said, "by these opinions, which have been
contradicted by the voice of the world. You do not mean to set at naught
the well-digested idea of centuries. The mathematical reason has long been
regarded as the reason par excellence."</p>
<p>"'Il y a � pari�r,'" replied Dupin, quoting from Chamfort, "'que toute
id�e publique, toute convention re�ue est une sottise, car elle a convenue
au plus grand nombre.' The mathematicians, I grant you, have done their
best to promulgate the popular error to which you allude, and which is
none the less an error for its promulgation as truth. With an art worthy a
better cause, for example, they have insinuated the term 'analysis' into
application to algebra. The French are the originators of this particular
deception; but if a term is of any importance—if words derive any
value from applicability—then 'analysis' conveys 'algebra' about as
much as, in Latin, 'ambitus' implies 'ambition,' 'religio' 'religion,' or
'homines honesti,' a set of honorablemen."</p>
<p>"You have a quarrel on hand, I see," said I, "with some of the algebraists
of Paris; but proceed."</p>
<p>"I dispute the availability, and thus the value, of that reason which is
cultivated in any especial form other than the abstractly logical. I
dispute, in particular, the reason educed by mathematical study. The
mathematics are the science of form and quantity; mathematical reasoning
is merely logic applied to observation upon form and quantity. The great
error lies in supposing that even the truths of what is called pure
algebra, are abstract or general truths. And this error is so egregious
that I am confounded at the universality with which it has been received.
Mathematical axioms are not axioms of general truth. What is true of
relation—of form and quantity—is often grossly false in regard
to morals, for example. In this latter science it is very usually untrue
that the aggregated parts are equal to the whole. In chemistry also the
axiom fails. In the consideration of motive it fails; for two motives,
each of a given value, have not, necessarily, a value when united, equal
to the sum of their values apart. There are numerous other mathematical
truths which are only truths within the limits of relation. But the
mathematician argues, from his finite truths, through habit, as if they
were of an absolutely general applicability—as the world indeed
imagines them to be. Bryant, in his very learned 'Mythology,' mentions an
analogous source of error, when he says that 'although the Pagan fables
are not believed, yet we forget ourselves continually, and make inferences
from them as existing realities.' With the algebraists, however, who are
Pagans themselves, the 'Pagan fables' are believed, and the inferences are
made, not so much through lapse of memory, as through an unaccountable
addling of the brains. In short, I never yet encountered the mere
mathematician who could be trusted out of equal roots, or one who did not
clandestinely hold it as a point of his faith that x<sup>2</sup>+px was
absolutely and unconditionally equal to q. Say to one of these gentlemen,
by way of experiment, if you please, that you believe occasions may occur
where x<sup>2</sup>+px is not altogether equal to q, and, having made him
understand what you mean, get out of his reach as speedily as convenient,
for, beyond doubt, he will endeavor to knock you down.</p>
<p>"I mean to say," continued Dupin, while I merely laughed at his last
observations, "that if the Minister had been no more than a mathematician,
the Prefect would have been under no necessity of giving me this check. I
know him, however, as both mathematician and poet, and my measures were
adapted to his capacity, with reference to the circumstances by which he
was surrounded. I knew him as a courtier, too, and as a bold intriguant.
Such a man, I considered, could not fail to be aware of the ordinary
policial modes of action. He could not have failed to anticipate—and
events have proved that he did not fail to anticipate—the waylayings
to which he was subjected. He must have foreseen, I reflected, the secret
investigations of his premises. His frequent absences from home at night,
which were hailed by the Prefect as certain aids to his success, I
regarded only as ruses, to afford opportunity for thorough search to the
police, and thus the sooner to impress them with the conviction to which G—,
in fact, did finally arrive—the conviction that the letter was not
upon the premises. I felt, also, that the whole train of thought, which I
was at some pains in detailing to you just now, concerning the invariable
principle of policial action in searches for articles concealed—I
felt that this whole train of thought would necessarily pass through the
mind of the Minister. It would imperatively lead him to despise all the
ordinary nooks of concealment. He could not, I reflected, be so weak as
not to see that the most intricate and remote recess of his hotel would be
as open as his commonest closets to the eyes, to the probes, to the
gimlets, and to the microscopes of the Prefect. I saw, in fine, that he
would be driven, as a matter of course, to simplicity, if not deliberately
induced to it as a matter of choice. You will remember, perhaps, how
desperately the Prefect laughed when I suggested, upon our first
interview, that it was just possible this mystery troubled him so much on
account of its being so very self-evident."</p>
<p>"Yes," said I, "I remember his merriment well. I really thought he would
have fallen into convulsions."</p>
<p>"The material world," continued Dupin, "abounds with very strict analogies
to the immaterial; and thus some color of truth has been given to the
rhetorical dogma, that metaphor, or simile, may be made to strengthen an
argument, as well as to embellish a description. The principle of the vis
inerti�, for example, seems to be identical in physics and metaphysics. It
is not more true in the former, that a large body is with more difficulty
set in motion than a smaller one, and that its subsequent momentum is
commensurate with this difficulty, than it is, in the latter, that
intellects of the vaster capacity, while more forcible, more constant, and
more eventful in their movements than those of inferior grade, are yet the
less readily moved, and more embarrassed and full of hesitation in the
first few steps of their progress. Again: have you ever noticed which of
the street signs, over the shop-doors, are the most attractive of
attention?"</p>
<p>"I have never given the matter a thought," I said.</p>
<p>"There is a game of puzzles," he resumed, "which is played upon a map. One
party playing requires another to find a given word—the name of
town, river, state or empire—any word, in short, upon the motley and
perplexed surface of the chart. A novice in the game generally seeks to
embarrass his opponents by giving them the most minutely lettered names;
but the adept selects such words as stretch, in large characters, from one
end of the chart to the other. These, like the over-largely lettered signs
and placards of the street, escape observation by dint of being
excessively obvious; and here the physical oversight is precisely
analogous with the moral inapprehension by which the intellect suffers to
pass unnoticed those considerations which are too obtrusively and too
palpably self-evident. But this is a point, it appears, somewhat above or
beneath the understanding of the Prefect. He never once thought it
probable, or possible, that the Minister had deposited the letter
immediately beneath the nose of the whole world, by way of best preventing
any portion of that world from perceiving it.</p>
<p>"But the more I reflected upon the daring, dashing, and discriminating
ingenuity of D—; upon the fact that the document must always have
been at hand, if he intended to use it to good purpose; and upon the
decisive evidence, obtained by the Prefect, that it was not hidden within
the limits of that dignitary's ordinary search—the more satisfied I
became that, to conceal this letter, the Minister had resorted to the
comprehensive and sagacious expedient of not attempting to conceal it at
all.</p>
<p>"Full of these ideas, I prepared myself with a pair of green spectacles,
and called one fine morning, quite by accident, at the Ministerial hotel.
I found D— at home, yawning, lounging, and dawdling, as usual, and
pretending to be in the last extremity of ennui. He is, perhaps, the most
really energetic human being now alive—but that is only when nobody
sees him.</p>
<p>"To be even with him, I complained of my weak eyes, and lamented the
necessity of the spectacles, under cover of which I cautiously and
thoroughly surveyed the whole apartment, while seemingly intent only upon
the conversation of my host.</p>
<p>"I paid especial attention to a large writing-table near which he sat, and
upon which lay confusedly, some miscellaneous letters and other papers,
with one or two musical instruments and a few books. Here, however, after
a long and very deliberate scrutiny, I saw nothing to excite particular
suspicion.</p>
<p>"At length my eyes, in going the circuit of the room, fell upon a trumpery
fillagree card-rack of pasteboard, that hung dangling by a dirty blue
ribbon, from a little brass knob just beneath the middle of the
mantel-piece. In this rack, which had three or four compartments, were
five or six visiting cards and a solitary letter. This last was much
soiled and crumpled. It was torn nearly in two, across the middle—as
if a design, in the first instance, to tear it entirely up as worthless,
had been altered, or stayed, in the second. It had a large black seal,
bearing the D— cipher very conspicuously, and was addressed, in a
diminutive female hand, to D—, the minister, himself. It was thrust
carelessly, and even, as it seemed, contemptuously, into one of the
uppermost divisions of the rack.</p>
<p>"No sooner had I glanced at this letter, than I concluded it to be that of
which I was in search. To be sure, it was, to all appearance, radically
different from the one of which the Prefect had read us so minute a
description. Here the seal was large and black, with the D— cipher;
there it was small and red, with the ducal arms of the S— family.
Here, the address, to the Minister, diminutive and feminine; there the
superscription, to a certain royal personage, was markedly bold and
decided; the size alone formed a point of correspondence. But, then, the
radicalness of these differences, which was excessive; the dirt; the
soiled and torn condition of the paper, so inconsistent with the true
methodical habits of D—, and so suggestive of a design to delude the
beholder into an idea of the worthlessness of the document; these things,
together with the hyper-obtrusive situation of this document, full in the
view of every visiter, and thus exactly in accordance with the conclusions
to which I had previously arrived; these things, I say, were strongly
corroborative of suspicion, in one who came with the intention to suspect.</p>
<p>"I protracted my visit as long as possible, and, while I maintained a most
animated discussion with the Minister upon a topic which I knew well had
never failed to interest and excite him, I kept my attention really
riveted upon the letter. In this examination, I committed to memory its
external appearance and arrangement in the rack; and also fell, at length,
upon a discovery which set at rest whatever trivial doubt I might have
entertained. In scrutinizing the edges of the paper, I observed them to be
more chafed than seemed necessary. They presented the broken appearance
which is manifested when a stiff paper, having been once folded and
pressed with a folder, is refolded in a reversed direction, in the same
creases or edges which had formed the original fold. This discovery was
sufficient. It was clear to me that the letter had been turned, as a
glove, inside out, re-directed, and re-sealed. I bade the Minister good
morning, and took my departure at once, leaving a gold snuff-box upon the
table.</p>
<p>"The next morning I called for the snuff-box, when we resumed, quite
eagerly, the conversation of the preceding day. While thus engaged,
however, a loud report, as if of a pistol, was heard immediately beneath
the windows of the hotel, and was succeeded by a series of fearful
screams, and the shoutings of a terrified mob. D— rushed to a
casement, threw it open, and looked out. In the meantime, I stepped to the
card-rack, took the letter, put it in my pocket, and replaced it by a
fac-simile, (so far as regards externals,) which I had carefully prepared
at my lodgings—imitating the D— cipher, very readily, by means
of a seal formed of bread.</p>
<p>"The disturbance in the street had been occasioned by the frantic behavior
of a man with a musket. He had fired it among a crowd of women and
children. It proved, however, to have been without ball, and the fellow
was suffered to go his way as a lunatic or a drunkard. When he had gone, D—
came from the window, whither I had followed him immediately upon securing
the object in view. Soon afterwards I bade him farewell. The pretended
lunatic was a man in my own pay."</p>
<p>"But what purpose had you," I asked, "in replacing the letter by a
fac-simile? Would it not have been better, at the first visit, to have
seized it openly, and departed?"</p>
<p>"D—," replied Dupin, "is a desperate man, and a man of nerve. His
hotel, too, is not without attendants devoted to his interests. Had I made
the wild attempt you suggest, I might never have left the Ministerial
presence alive. The good people of Paris might have heard of me no more.
But I had an object apart from these considerations. You know my political
prepossessions. In this matter, I act as a partisan of the lady concerned.
For eighteen months the Minister has had her in his power. She has now him
in hers—since, being unaware that the letter is not in his
possession, he will proceed with his exactions as if it was. Thus will he
inevitably commit himself, at once, to his political destruction. His
downfall, too, will not be more precipitate than awkward. It is all very
well to talk about the facilis descensus Averni; but in all kinds of
climbing, as Catalani said of singing, it is far more easy to get up than
to come down. In the present instance I have no sympathy—at least no
pity—for him who descends. He is that monstrum horrendum, an
unprincipled man of genius. I confess, however, that I should like very
well to know the precise character of his thoughts, when, being defied by
her whom the Prefect terms 'a certain personage' he is reduced to opening
the letter which I left for him in the card-rack."</p>
<p>"How? did you put any thing particular in it?"</p>
<p>"Why—it did not seem altogether right to leave the interior blank—that
would have been insulting. D—, at Vienna once, did me an evil turn,
which I told him, quite good-humoredly, that I should remember. So, as I
knew he would feel some curiosity in regard to the identity of the person
who had outwitted him, I thought it a pity not to give him a clue. He is
well acquainted with my MS., and I just copied into the middle of the
blank sheet the words—</p>
<p>"'— — Un dessein si funeste, S'il n'est digne d'Atr�e, est
digne de Thyeste. They are to be found in Crebillon's 'Atr�e.'"</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />