<p><SPAN name="c2-1" id="c2-1"></SPAN> </p>
<h2>THE BERTRAMS.</h2>
<p> </p>
<hr class="narrow" />
<p> </p>
<h3>CHAPTER I.</h3>
<h4>THE NEW MEMBER FOR THE BATTERSEA HAMLETS.<br/> </h4>
<p>I must now ask my readers to pass over two years with me. It is a
terrible gap in a story; but in these days the unities are not much
considered, and a hiatus which would formerly have been regarded as a
fault utterly fatal is now no more than a slight impropriety.</p>
<p>But something must be told of the occurrences of these two years. In
the first place, no marriage had taken place—that is, among our
personages; nor had their ranks been thinned by any death. In our
retrospective view we will give the <i>pas</i> to Mr. Harcourt, for he had
taken the greatest stride in winning that world's success, which is
the goal of all our ambition. He had gone on and prospered greatly;
and nowadays all men at the bar said all manner of good things of
him. He was already in Parliament as the honourable member for the
Battersea Hamlets, and was not only there, but listened to when it
suited him to speak. But when he did speak, he spoke only as a
lawyer. He never allowed himself to be enticed away from his own
profession by the meretricious allurements of general politics. On
points of law reform, he had an energetic opinion; on matters
connected with justice, he had ideas which were very much his own—or
which at least were stated in language which was so; being a denizen
of the common law, he was loud against the delays and cost of
Chancery, and was supposed to have supplied the legal details of a
very telling tale which was written about this time with the object
of upsetting the lord-chancellor as then constituted.</p>
<p>But though he worked as a member only in legal matters, of course he
was always ready to support his party with his vote in all matters.
His party! here had been his great difficulty on first entering the
House of Commons. What should be his party?</p>
<p>He had worked hard as a lawyer. In so doing no party had been
necessary to him. Honest hard work—honest, that is, as regarded the
work itself, if not always so as regarded the object. Honest hard
work, and some cunning in the method of his eloquence, had at first
sufficed him. He was not called upon to have, or at any rate to
state, any marked political tenets. But no man can rise to great note
as a lawyer without a party. Opulence without note would by no means
have sufficed with Mr. Harcourt.</p>
<p>When, therefore, he found it expedient in the course of his
profession to go into Parliament, and with this object presented
himself to the inhabitants of the Battersea Hamlets, it was necessary
that he should adopt a party. At that time the political watchword of
the day was the repeal of the corn laws. Now the electors of the
Battersea Hamlets required especially to know whether Mr. Harcourt
was or was not for free trade in corn.</p>
<p>To tell the truth, he did not care two straws about corn. He cared
only for law—for that and what was to be got by it. It was necessary
that he should assume some care for corn—learn a good deal about it,
perhaps, so as to be able, if called on, to talk on the subject by
the hour at a stretch; but it was not a matter on which he was
personally solicitous a fortnight or so before he began his canvass.</p>
<p>The Conservatives were at that time in, and were declared foes to
free trade in corn. They were committed to the maintenance of a duty
on imported wheat—if any men were ever politically committed to
anything. Indeed, it had latterly been their great
shibboleth—latterly; that is, since their other greater shibboleths
had been cut from under their feet.</p>
<p>At that time men had not learnt thoroughly by experience, as now they
have, that no reform, no innovation—experience almost justifies us
in saying no revolution—stinks so foully in the nostrils of an
English Tory politician as to be absolutely irreconcilable to him.
When taken in the refreshing waters of office any such pill can be
swallowed. This is now a fact recognized in politics; and it is a
great point gained in favour of that party that their power of
deglutition should be so recognized. Let the people want what they
will, Jew senators, cheap corn, vote by ballot, no property
qualification, or anything else, the Tories will carry it for them if
the Whigs cannot. A poor Whig premier has none but the Liberals to
back him; but a reforming Tory will be backed by all the
world—except those few whom his own dishonesty will personally have
disgusted.</p>
<p>But at that time—some twelve or fifteen years since—all this was
not a part of the political A B C; and Harcourt had much doubt in his
own mind as to the party which ought to be blessed with his
adherence. Lord chancellorships and lord chief-justiceships, though
not enjoyed till middle life, or, indeed, till the evening of a
lawyer's days, must, in fact, be won or lost in the heyday of his
career. One false step in his political novitiate may cost him
everything. A man when known as a recognized Whig may fight battle
after battle with mercenary electors, sit yawning year after year
till twelve o'clock, ready to attack on every point the tactics of
his honourable and learned friend on the Treasury seats, and yet see
junior after junior rise to the bench before him—and all because at
starting he decided wrongly as to his party.</p>
<p>If Harcourt had predilections, they were with the Whigs; but he was
not weak enough to let any predilection be a burden to his interests.
Where was the best opening for him? The Tories—I still prefer the
name, as being without definite meaning; the direct falsehood implied
in the title of Conservative amounts almost to a libel—the Tories
were in; but from the fact of being in, were always liable to be
turned out. Then, too, they were of course provided with attorneys
and solicitors-general, lords-advocate and legal hangers-on of every
sort. The coming chances might be better with the Whigs.</p>
<p>Under these circumstances, he went to his old friend Mr. Die, Mr.
Neversaye Die, the rich, quiet, hard-working, old chancery barrister,
to whose fostering care he had some time since recommended his friend
Bertram. Every one has some quiet, old, family, confidential friend;
a man given to silence, but of undoubted knowledge of the world,
whose experience is vast, and who, though he has not risen in the
world himself, is always the man to help others to do so. Every one
has such a friend as this, and Mr. Neversaye Die was Harcourt's
friend. Mr. Die himself was supposed to be a Tory, quite of the old
school, a Lord Eldon Tory; but Harcourt knew that this would in no
way bias his judgment. The mind of a barrister who has been for fifty
years practising in court will never be biassed by his predilections.</p>
<p>Mr. Die soon understood the whole matter. His young friend Harcourt
was going into Parliament with the special object of becoming a
solicitor-general as soon as possible. He could so become by means
only of two moving powers. He must be solicitor-general either to the
Whigs or to the Tories. To which he should be so was a question
mainly indifferent to Mr. Harcourt himself, and also to Mr. Die in
framing his advice.</p>
<p>Mr. Die himself of course regarded corn-law repeal as an invention of
the devil. He had lived long enough to have regarded Catholic
emancipation and parliamentary reform in the same light. Could you
have opened his mind, you would probably have found there a settled
conviction that the world was slowly coming to an end, that end being
brought about by such devilish works as these. But you would also
have found a conviction that the Three per Cents. would last his
time, and that his fear for the future might with safety be thrown
forward, so as to appertain to the fourth or fifth, or, perhaps, even
to the tenth or twelfth coming generation. Mr. Die was not,
therefore, personally wretched under his own political creed.</p>
<p>"I should be inclined to support the government if I were going into
Parliament as a young man," said Mr. Die.</p>
<p>"There are nine seniors of mine in the House who now do so." By
seniors, Mr. Harcourt alluded to his seniors at the bar.</p>
<p>"Yes; but they like young blood nowadays. I think it's the safest."</p>
<p>"I shall never carry the Battersea Hamlets unless I pledge myself on
this corn-law question."</p>
<p>"Well," said Mr. Die—"well; a seat is certainly a great thing, and
not to be had at any moment. I think I should be inclined to yield to
the electors."</p>
<p>"And commit myself to the repeal of the corn laws?"</p>
<p>"Commit yourself!" said Mr. Die, with a gentle smile. "A public man
has to commit himself to many things nowadays. But my opinion is,
that—that you may hold the popular opinion about free trade, and be
not a whit the less useful to Sir Robert on that account."</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt was still a young man, and was, therefore, excusable in
not seeing to the depth of Mr. Die's wisdom. He certainly did not see
to the depth of it; but he had come to his oracle with faith, and
wisely resolved to be guided by wisdom so much superior to his own.</p>
<p>"Never bind yourself wantonly to an expiring policy," said Mr. Die.
"The man who does so has surely to unbind himself; and, to say the
least of it, that always takes time."</p>
<p>So Mr. Harcourt presented himself to the electors of the Battersea
Hamlets as a man very anxious in their behalf in all things, but
anxious in their behalf above all things for free trade in corn. "Is
it credible, that now, in this year of grace 184—,—" and so on.
Such were the eloquent words which he addressed to the electors on
this subject, and so taken were they by his enthusiasm that they
returned him by a large majority.</p>
<p>Mr. Dod, therefore, in his remarkably useful little parliamentary
compendium, put down Mr. Harcourt as a liberal: this he had an
opportunity of doing immediately after Mr. Harcourt's election: in
his next edition, however, he added, "but supports the general policy
of Sir Robert Peel's government."</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt had altogether managed this little affair so well that,
despite his youth, despite also those nine political seniors of his,
men began to talk of him as one who might shortly hope to fill high
places. He made himself very useful in the House, and did so in a
quiet, business-like, unexciting manner, very pleasant to the leading
politician of the Treasury bench.</p>
<p>And then there came the Irish famine, and all the bindings of all the
Tories were scattered to the winds like feathers. The Irishman's
potato-pot ceased to be full, and at once the great territorial
magnates of England were convinced that they had clung to the horns
of a false altar. They were convinced; or at least had to acknowledge
such conviction. The prime minister held short little debates with
his underlings—with dukes and marquises, with earls and viscounts;
held short debates with them, but allowed to no underling—to no
duke, and to no viscount—to have any longer an opinion of his own.
The altar had been a false altar: it was enough for them that they
were so told. With great wisdom the majority of them considered that
this <i>was</i> enough; and so the bill for the repeal of the corn laws
was brought before the House, and the world knew that it would be
carried.</p>
<p>And now there was a great opportunity for Mr. Harcourt. He could
support the prime minister and merit all manner of legal generalships
without any self-unbinding. Alas! such comfort as this can only
belong to the young among politicians! Up to this period he had
meddled only with law questions. Now was the time for him to come out
with that great liberal speech, which should merit the eternal
gratitude of the Tory leader. Just at the time at which we recommence
our tale he did come out with a very great liberal speech, in which,
as an independent member, he vehemently eulogized the daring policy
of that great man who, as he said, was brave enough, and wise enough,
and good enough to save his country at the expense of his party.
Whether there were not men who could have saved their country without
betraying their friends—who would have done so had not Sir Robert
been ready with his apostacy; who in fact did so by forcing Sir
Robert to his apostacy—as to that, Mr. Harcourt then said nothing.
What might not be expected from the hands of a man so eulogized? of a
man who was thus able to keep the votes of the Tories and carry the
measures of the Liberals? of a man of whom it might now be predicated
that his political power would end only with his political life? We
should be going on too fast were we to declare in how few months
after this triumph that great political chieftain was driven from the
Treasury bench.</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt's name was now mentioned in all clubs and all
dining-rooms. He was an acute and successful lawyer, an eloquent
debater, and a young man. The world was at his feet, and Mr. Die was
very proud of him. Mr. Die was proud of him, and proud also of his
own advice. He said nothing about it even to Harcourt himself, for to
Mr. Die had been given the gift of reticence; but his old eye
twinkled as his wisdom was confessed by the youth at his feet. "In
politics one should always look forward," he said, as he held up to
the light the glass of old port which he was about to sip; "in real
life it is better to look back,—if one has anything to look back
at." Mr. Die had something to look back at. He had sixty thousand
pounds in the funds.</p>
<p>And now we must say a word of Mr. Harcourt, with reference to the
other persons of our story. He was still very intimate with Bertram,
but he hardly regarded him in the same light as he had done two years
before. Bertram had not hitherto justified the expectation of his
friends. This must be explained more at length in the next two
chapters; but the effect on Harcourt had been that he no longer
looked up with reverence to his friend's undoubted talents. He had a
lower opinion of him than formerly. Indeed, he himself had risen so
quickly that he had left Bertram immeasurably below him, and the
difference in their pursuits naturally brought them together less
frequently than heretofore.</p>
<p>But if Harcourt was less concerned than he had been with George
Bertram junior, he was much more concerned than he had been with
George Bertram senior. He had in former days known nothing of the old
merchant; now he was, within certain bounds, almost intimate with
him; occasionally dined down at Hadley, and frequently consulted him
on money matters of deep import.</p>
<p>With Miss Baker, also, and Caroline Waddington, Mr. Harcourt was
intimate. Between him and Miss Baker there existed a warm friendship,
and with Caroline, even, he was on such terms that she often spoke to
him as to the deep troubles of her love and engagement. For these
were deep troubles, as will be seen also in the coming chapters.</p>
<p>George Bertram had been told by Miss Baker that Caroline was the
granddaughter of old Mr. Bertram, and George in his confidence with
his friend had told him the secret. Indeed, there had been hardly any
alternative, for George had been driven to consult his friend more
than once as to this delay in his marriage; and who can ever consult
a friend with advantage on any subject without telling him all the
circumstances?</p>
<p>It was after this that Harcourt and Miss Baker became so intimate.
The ladies at Littlebath had many troubles, and during those troubles
the famous young barrister was very civil to them. In the latter of
those two years that are now gone, circumstances had brought them up
to London for a couple of months in the spring; and then they saw
much of Mr. Harcourt, but nothing of George Bertram, though George
was still the affianced husband of Miss Waddington.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />